<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xml:lang="ru"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">inovmed</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="ru">Инновационная медицина Кубани</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Innovative Medicine of Kuban</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2541-9897</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Institute – Ochapovsky Regional Clinical Hospital No. 1</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.35401/2500-0268-2020-18-2-51-56</article-id><article-id custom-type="elpub" pub-id-type="custom">inovmed-276</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>ЭКСПЕРИМЕНТАЛЬНОЕ ИССЛЕДОВАНИЕ</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>EXPERIMENTAL RESEARCH</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>Оценка улучшения регенераторной способности печеночной ткани при использовании клеточных технологий после выполнения резекции печени</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Enhanced liver regeneration when using cell therapy after liver resection</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4605-9887</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Коткас</surname><given-names>И. Е.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Kotkas</surname><given-names>I. E.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>Коткас Инна Евгеньевна, к. м. н., заведующая хирургическим отделением, доцент кафедры факультетской хирургии им. И.И. Грекова</p><p>191015, Санкт-Петербург, ул. Кирочная, д. 41</p></bio><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Inna E. Kotkas, Cand. of Sci. (Med.), Head of the Surgical Department, Associate Professor, Department of Faculty Surgery named after I.I. Grekov</p><p>41, Kirochnaya str., St. Petersburg, 191015</p></bio><email xlink:type="simple">inna.kotkas@yandex.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2329-0023</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Земляной</surname><given-names>В. П.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Zemlianoi</surname><given-names>V. P.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>Земляной Вячеслав Петрович, д. м. н., профессор, декан хирургического факультета, заведующий кафедрой факультетской хирургии им. И.И. Грекова</p></bio><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Viacheslav P. Zemlianoi, Dr. of Sci. (Med.), Professor, Dean of the Surgical Faculty, Head of the Department of Faculty Surgery named after I.I. Grekov</p></bio><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff-1"><aff xml:lang="ru"><institution>Северо-Западный государственный медицинский университет имени И.И. Мечникова Министерства здравоохранения РФ</institution><country>Россия</country></aff><aff xml:lang="en"><institution>North-Western State Medical University named after I.I. Mechnikov</institution><country>Russian Federation</country></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date pub-type="collection"><year>2020</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>30</day><month>06</month><year>2020</year></pub-date><volume>0</volume><issue>2</issue><fpage>51</fpage><lpage>56</lpage><permissions><copyright-statement>Copyright &amp;#x00A9; Коткас И.Е., Земляной В.П., 2020</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2020</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Коткас И.Е., Земляной В.П.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Kotkas I.E., Zemlianoi V.P.</copyright-holder><license xml:lang="ru" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.</license-p></license><license xml:lang="en" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.</license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://www.innovmedkub.ru/jour/article/view/276">https://www.innovmedkub.ru/jour/article/view/276</self-uri><abstract><sec><title>Обоснование</title><p>Обоснование. Необходимость поиска наиболее эффективных способов восстановления функции печени после выполнения ее резекции.</p></sec><sec><title>Цель</title><p>Цель. Оценка эффективности использования клеточных технологий при резекции печени в эксперименте.</p></sec><sec><title>Материал и методы</title><p>Материал и методы. В эксперимент включено 210 мышей линии C57 black. Все особи разделены на 4 группы, по 60 особей в группах № 1–3 и 30 особей в группе № 4. Особям групп № 1–3 выполнялись резекции печени в объеме 60–65% от всей массы печени. Особям группы № 1 стволовые клетки вводились интраоперационно внутривенно, № 2 – интраоперационно внутрипортально. Особям группы № 3 стволовые клетки не вводились. Особи группы № 4 (n = 30) были выведены из эксперимента с целью определения средней массы печени и получения стволовых клеток.</p></sec><sec><title>Результаты</title><p>Результаты. На 10-е сутки после операции масса печени мышей в группе № 2 соответствовала нормальным показателям, в группе № 1 составляла 79% от нормы, № 3 – 62,6% от нормы. Уровень общего белка и альбумина на 10-е сутки после операции в группе № 2 был в пределах нормы, в группе № 1 составил 75 и 87% нормы соответственно, № 3 – 51,7 и 64,5% нормы соответственно. На 10-е сутки после операции уровень АСТ в группе № 2 был на 4% выше исходного, № 1 – на 26%, № 3 – на 58% выше исходного. Уровни АСТ и щелочной фосфатазы на 10-е сутки после операции в группе № 1 были соответственно на 51 и 189% выше первоначального, № 2 – на 5,9 и 49% и в № 3 – на 90 и 266% выше исходного соответственно.</p></sec><sec><title>Заключение</title><p>Заключение. Использование клеточных технологий при резекции печени способствует более быстрому восстановлению функции печени в послеоперационном периоде. </p></sec></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><sec><title>Background</title><p>Background. The need to find the most effective ways to restore liver function after performing its resection.</p></sec><sec><title>Objective</title><p>Objective. To evaluate the effectiveness of the use of stem cell technology in liver resection in an experiment.</p></sec><sec><title>Material and Methods</title><p>Material and Methods. 210 C57 black mice were included in the experiment. All individuals were divided into 4 groups, 60 individuals in groups 1–3 and 30 individuals in group 4. Individuals of groups 1–3 underwent liver resections in the amount of 60–65% of the total liver mass. To the individuals of group 1, stem cells were administered intraoperatively intravenously, group 2 – intraoperatively intraportally. No stem cells were introduced to individuals of group 3. Individuals of group 4 (n = 30) were removed from the experiment to determine the average liver mass and obtain stem cells.</p></sec><sec><title>Results</title><p>Results. On the 10th day after the operation, the liver mass of mice in group 2 corresponded to normal indicators, in group 1 it was 79% of the norm, in group 3 – 62.6% of the norm. The level of total protein and albumin on day 10 after surgery in group 2 was within normal limits, in group 1 – 75% and 87% of the norm, in group 3 – 51.7% and 64.5% of the norm respectively. On the 10th day after the operation, the AST level in group 2 was 4% higher than the baseline, in group 1 – 26%, in group 3 – 58% higher than the baseline. The level of AST and alkaline phosphatase on day 10 after surgery in group 1 was 51% and 189% higher than the initial level, in group 2 – 5.9% and 49%, in group 3 – 90% and 266% higher respectively.</p></sec><sec><title>Conclusion</title><p>Conclusion. The use of stem cell technology in liver resection contributes to a faster restoration of liver function in the postoperative period. </p></sec></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>резекция печени</kwd><kwd>клеточные технологии</kwd><kwd>стволовые клетки</kwd><kwd>восстановление функции печени</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>liver resection</kwd><kwd>cell technology</kwd><kwd>stem cells</kwd><kwd>restoration of liver function</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="cit1"><label>1</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Michalopoulos GK. Liver regeneration. J Cell Physiol. 2007;213:286–300. PMID: 17559071. PMCID: PMC2701258. doi:10.1002/jcp.21172</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Michalopoulos GK. Liver regeneration. J Cell Physiol. 2007;213:286–300. PMID: 17559071. PMCID: PMC2701258. doi:10.1002/jcp.21172</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit2"><label>2</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Сидорова В.Ф., Рябинина З.А., Лейкина Е.М. Регенерация печени у млекопитающих. Л.: Медицина; 1966. 205 с.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Sidorova VF, Ryabinina ZA, Leykina EM. Liver Regeneration in Mammals. Leningrad: Meditsina; 1966. 205 p. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit3"><label>3</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Michalopoulos GK, DeFrances MC. Liver regeneration. Science. 1997;276(5309);60–6. PMID: 9082986. doi:10.1126/science.276.5309.60</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Michalopoulos GK, DeFrances MC. Liver regeneration. Science. 1997;276(5309);60–6. PMID: 9082986. doi:10.1126/science.276.5309.60</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit4"><label>4</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Michalopoulos GK. Liver regeneration after partial hepatectomy, critical analysis of mechanistic dilemmas. Am J Pathol. 2010;176:2–13. PMID: 20019184. PMCID: PMC2797862. doi:10.2353/ajpath.2010.090675</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Michalopoulos GK. Liver regeneration after partial hepatectomy, critical analysis of mechanistic dilemmas. Am J Pathol. 2010;176:2–13. PMID: 20019184. PMCID: PMC2797862. doi:10.2353/ajpath.2010.090675</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit5"><label>5</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Higgins GM, Anderson RM. Experimental pathology of the liver: restoration of the liver of the white rat following partial surgical removal. Arch Pathol. 1931;72:186–202.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Higgins GM, Anderson RM. Experimental pathology of the liver: restoration of the liver of the white rat following partial surgical removal. Arch Pathol. 1931;72:186–202.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit6"><label>6</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Бродский В.Я., Урываева И.В. Клеточная полиплоидия. Пролиферация и дифференцировка. М.: Наука; 1981. 259 с.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Brodsky VYa, Uryvaeva IV. Polyploidy. Proliferation and Differentiation. Moscow: Nauka; 1981. 259 p. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit7"><label>7</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Stanger BZ. Organ size determination and the limits of regulation. Cell Cycle. 2008;7:318–24. PMID: 18235243. doi:10.4161/cc.7.3.5348</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Stanger BZ. Organ size determination and the limits of regulation. Cell Cycle. 2008;7:318–24. PMID: 18235243. doi:10.4161/cc.7.3.5348</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit8"><label>8</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Chen F-M, Wu L-A, Zhang M, Zhang R, Sun H-H. Homing of endogenous stem/progenitor cells for in situ tissue regeneration: promises, strategies, and translational perspectives. Biomaterials. 2011;32:3189–209. PMID: 21300401. doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.12.032</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Chen F-M, Wu L-A, Zhang M, Zhang R, Sun H-H. Homing of endogenous stem/progenitor cells for in situ tissue regeneration: promises, strategies, and translational perspectives. Biomaterials. 2011;32:3189–209. PMID: 21300401. doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.12.032</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit9"><label>9</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Wu X-B, Ran T. Hepatocyte differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int. 2012;11:360–74. doi:10.1016/S1499-3872(12)60193-3</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Wu X-B, Ran T. Hepatocyte differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int. 2012;11:360–74. doi:10.1016/S1499-3872(12)60193-3</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref></ref-list><fn-group><fn fn-type="conflict"><p>The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.</p></fn></fn-group></back></article>
