Evaluating the Effectiveness of the Experimental Use of the Collagen Conduit Filled With Dermal hydrogel to Repair a Peripheral Nerve Defect

Background: Current studies show that hollow conduits in combination with various synthetic and biological fillers significantly accelerate functional recovery of peripheral nerves. One of such fillers can be a hydrogel based on the extracellular matrix of the dermis, which contains surface ligands capable of providing topographic and biological signals for nerve regeneration.

Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of rat sciatic nerve regeneration using a collagen conduit filled with dermal hydrogel in an in vivo experiment.

Materials and methods: We evaluated the effectiveness of the NeuraGen® collagen conduit filled with dermal hydrogel and compared it with that of an autograft and the NeuraGen® hollow collagen conduit in experimental treatment of rat sciatic nerve defects larger than 1 cm. Male Wistar rats underwent sciatic nerve resection. We calculated the Sciatic Functional Index (SFI) and ratio of the calf circumference in an operated limb to that in an intact limb on days 30, 60, and 90 after implantation. We performed electrophysiological tests and explanted samples for hematoxylin-eosin staining on day 90 of the experiment.

Results: When assessing the SFI and electrophysiological parameters, the group of animals with autografts and the group with the NeuraGen® collagen conduits filled with dermal hydrogel demonstrated similar results. We observed muscle atrophy, low SFI scores, and low velocity and short duration of the action potential in the group with the hollow NeuraGen® collagen conduits. Histological analysis of explanted samples of the collagen conduits filled with dermal hydrogel demonstrated areas of glial proliferation and the absence of pronounced degeneration of nerve fibers throughout the implant compared with autografts, indicating functional regeneration of nerve fibers.

Conclusions: Evaluation of the effectiveness of rat sciatic nerve regeneration showed that the NeuraGen® collagen conduit filled with dermal hydrogel provides functional and morphological integration with the nerve compared with an autograft. Our findings can be used for further development and improvement of nerve conduits.

1. Griffin JW, Hogan MV, ChhabraAB, Deal DN. Peripheral nerve repair and reconstruction. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013;95(23):2144– 2151. PMID: 24306702. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.L.00704

2. Tuturov AO, Pyatin VF, Sergeev SM. Prospects for development of technologies for restoration of extended nerve defects with use of conduits. Polytrauma. 2019;(2):95–101. (In Russ.).

3. Pyatin VF, Tuturov AO. Significance of the composition of conduit internal environment for the activation of axon growth in patients with extended peripheral nerve defects. Zhurnal nevrologii i psikhiatrii im SS Korsakova. 2019;119(4):100–105. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17116/jnevro2019119041100

4. de Luca AC, Lacour SP, Raffoul W, di Summa PG. Extracellular matrix components in peripheral nerve repair: how to affect neural cellular response and nerve regeneration?. Neural Regen Res. 2014;9(22):1943–1948. PMID: 25598773. PMCID: PMC4283273. https://doi.org/10.4103/1673-5374.145366

5. Daly WT, Yao L, Abu-rub MT, et al. The effect of intraluminal contact mediated guidance signals on axonal mismatch during peripheral nerve repair. Biomaterials. 2012;33(28):6660–6671. PMID: 22738778. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.06.002

6. Gardiner NJ. Integrins and the extracellular matrix: key mediators of development and regeneration of the sensory nervous system. Dev Neurobiol. 2011;71(11):1054–1072. PMID: 21761574. https://doi.org/10.1002/dneu.20950

7. Navarro X. Functional evaluation of peripheral nerve regeneration and target reinnervation in animal models: a critical overview. Eur J Neurosci. 2016;43(3):271–286. PMID: 26228942. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejn.13033

8. Song S, McConnell KW, Amores D, et al. Electrical stimulation of human neural stem cells via conductive polymer nerve guides enhances peripheral nerve recovery. Biomaterials. 2021;275:120982. PMID: 34214785. PMCID: PMC8325644. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2021.120982

9. Oh SH, Kang JG, Kim TH, et al. Enhanced peripheral nerve regeneration through asymmetrically porous nerve guide conduit with nerve growth factor gradient. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2018;106(1):52–64. PMID: 28875561. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.36216

10. Sensharma P, Madhumathi G, Jayant RD, Jaiswal AK. Biomaterials and cells for neural tissue engineering: current choices. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2017;77:1302–1315. PMID: 28532008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2017.03.264

11. Farjah GH, Dolatkhah MA, Pourheidar B, Heshmatian B. The effect of cerebrospinal fluid in collagen guide channel on sciatic nerve regeneration in rats. Turk Neurosurg. 2017;27(3):453–459. PMID: 27593797. https://doi.org/10.5137/1019-5149.JTN.16004-15.2

12. Meder T, Prest T, Skillen C, et al. Nerve-specifi extracellular matrix hydrogel promotes functional regeneration following nerve gap injury. NPJ Regen Med. 2021;6(1):69. PMID: 34697304. PMCID: PMC8546053. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41536-021-00174-8

13. Du J, Liu J, Yao S, et al. Prompt peripheral nerve regeneration induced by a hierarchically aligned fibrin nanofiber hydrogel. Acta Biomater. 2017;55:296–309. PMID: 28412554. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2017.04.010

14. Xu H, Yu Y, Zhang L, et al. Sustainable release of nerve growth factor for peripheral nerve regeneration using nerve conduits laden with Bioconjugated hyaluronic acid-chitosan hydrogel. Composites Part B: Engineering. 2022;230:109509. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2021.109509