The Predictors of Surgical Complications in the Treatment of Patients with Post-Traumatic Deformities of the Lower Thoracic and Lumbar Spine
https://doi.org/10.35401/2541-9897-2026-11-1-35-44
Abstract
Objectives: To identify predictors of complications in corrective surgeries in patients with post-traumatic deformities of the lower thoracic and lumbar spine.
Materials and methods: A total of 152 adult patients with post-traumatic deformities of the lower thoracic and lumbar spine were included. The patients were divided into two groups depending on the correction method. Each group was subdivided into two subgroups:
Group 1 (n=64) consisted of patients who underwent staged surgical treatment, which included correction using an external fixation device. It was followed by ventral or dorsal stabilization of the injured spinal motion segments, reconstruction of the anterior column and corporodesis. Depending on whether surgical mobilization of the injured spinal motion segments was performed prior to correction with external fixation, Group 1 was subdivided into subgroup 1.1 (n=46) and subgroup 1.2 (n=18).
Group 2 (n=88) included patients who underwent single-stage surgical treatment involving correction through surgical mobilization of the injured spinal motion segments, transpedicular fixation, anterior column reconstruction, and corporodesis. Depending on the surgical approaches, Group 2 was divided into subgroup 2.1 (n=53) – procedures with combined approaches, and subgroup 2.2 (n=35) – procedures with the posterior approach.
The analysis of factors influencing the incidence of complications included the methods of deformity correction, the complexity of deformities (angular or angulation-translation), the severity of preoperative neurological deficit, the localization of deformity, the duration of surgery, and the volume of blood loss.
Conclusions: In the surgical treatment of post-traumatic deformities with posterior approaches, the most significant predictor of intraoperative cerebrospinal fluid leakage, wound infection, neurological complications, and partial loss of correction is the spondylometric complexity of the deformity with vertebral translation.
In single-stage surgeries performed through combined approaches using the DVD sequence, deformity complexity with a translational component is a predictor of wound infection and respiratory complications.
In posterior approach surgeries, the risk of neurological complications increases in patients with an initial absent or minimal neurological deficit.
For staged treatment of post-traumatic deformities with preliminary repositioning of an external fixation device, no statistically significant predictors of complications were identified.
About the Authors
A. A. AfaunovRussian Federation
Asker A. Afaunov - Dr. Sci. (Med.), Professor, Head of the Department of Orthopedics, Traumatology and Military Field Surgery, Kuban State Medical University.
167 1 Maya St., Krasnodar, 350086
N. S. Chaikin
Russian Federation
Nikita S. Chaikin - Cand. Sci. (Med.), Neurosurgeon, Neurosurgeon Unit, Stavropol Regional Clinical Hospital.
Stavropol
I. V. Basankin
Russian Federation
Igor V. Basankin - Dr. Sci. (Med.), Professor, Surgery Department No.1, Faculty of Continuing Professional Development and Retraining, Kuban State Medical University; Head of the Neurosurgery Department No. 3, Scientific Research Institute – Ochapovsky Regional Clinical Hospital No. 1.
Krasnodar
M. Yu. Ageev
Russian Federation
Mikhail Yu. Ageev - Assistant Professor, Department of Orthopedics, Traumatology and Military Field Surgery, Kuban State Medical University; Orthopedic traumatologist, Scientific Research Institute – Ochapovsky Regional Clinical Hospital No. 1.
Krasnodar
E. E. Filatova
Russian Federation
Elizaveta E. Filatova - 6th year Student, Faculty of Medicine, Kuban State Medical University.
Krasnodar
References
1. Vaccaro AR, Silber JS. Post-traumatic spinal deformity. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2001;26(24 Suppl):S111-S118. PMID: 11805617. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-200112151-00019
2. Haydarov V.M., TkachenkoA.N., Kirilova I.A., Mansurov D.Sh. Prediction of surgical site infection in spine surgery. Russian Journal of Spine Surgery (Khirurgiya Pozvonochnika). 2018;15(2):84-90. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.14531/ss2018.2.84-90
3. Ryabykh S.O., Khomchenkov M.V., Savin D.M. Vertebral column resection technique to treat sequelae of severe spine and spinal cord injury. Russian Journal of Spine Surgery (Khirurgiya Pozvonochnika). 2013;(4):013-016. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.14531/ss2013.4.13-16
4. Afaunov A.A., Kuzmenko A.V., Basankin I.V., Ageev M.Yu. Classification of post-traumatic deformities of the thoracic and lumbar spine. Russian Journal of Spine Surgery (Khirurgiya Pozvonochnika). (In Russ.). 2018;15(2):23-32. https://doi.org/10.14531/ss2018.2.23-32
5. Kirshblum SC, Burns SP, Biering-Sorensen F, et al. International standards for neurological classification of spinal cord injury (revised 2011). J Spinal Cord Med. 2011;34(6):535-546. PMID: 22330108. PMCID: PMC3232636. https://doi.org/10.1179/204577211x13207446293695
6. Johnson EW. Visual analog scale (VAS). Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2001;80(10):717. PMID: 11562551. https://doi.org/10.1097/00002060-200110000-00001
7. Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR. A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis. 1987;40(5):373-383. PMID: 3558716. https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9681(87)90171-8
8. Tan GH, Goss BG, Thorpe PJ, Williams RP. CT-based classification of long spinal allograft fusion. Eur Spine J. 2007;16(11):1875-1881. PMID: 17497188. PMCID: PMC2223338. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-007-0376-0
9. Orbelian L.K., Durleshter V.M., Bykov (j-r) I.M. Early prognosis of outcomes of acute pancreatitis with different etiologies: A retrospective observational study. Kuban Scientific Medical Bulletin. 2025;32(2):41-54. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.25207/1608-6228-2025-32-2-41-54
10. Borzykh K.O., Rerikh V.V., Borin V.V. Complications of the treatment of post-traumatic deformities of the thoracic and lumbar spine using staged surgical interventions. Russian Journal of Spine Surgery (Khirurgiya Pozvonochnika). 2020;17(1):6-14. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.14531/ss2020.1.6-14
11. Uvarov I.B., Sichinava D.D., Manuilov A.M. Comparative analysis of outcome predictors in patients with postoperative peritonitis depending on the method of surgical treatment – relaparotomy on demand vs vacuum-assisted laparostomy. Innovative Medicine of Kuban. 2022;(4):24-31. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.35401/2541-9897-2022-25-4-24-31
12. Mirzaeva L.M., Lobzin S.V., Chistova I.V., Rizahanova O.A., Dulaev A.A. Predictors of complications and mortality in traumatic spinal cord injuries. Kuban Scientific Medical Bulletin. 2020;27(1):59-71. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.25207/1608-6228-2020-27-1-59-71
13. Dulaev A.K., Khan I.Sh., Dulaeva N.M. Causes of anatomical and functional failure of treatment in a patients with thoracic and lumbar spine fractures. Russian Journal of Spine Surgery (Khirurgiya Pozvonochnika). 2009;(2):017-024. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.14531/ss2009.2.17-24
14. Abd El-Latif, Mohammed Serry El-Said. Surgical treatment of post-traumatic kyphosis using modified pedicle subtraction osteotomy. The Egyptian Orthopaedic Journal. 2015;50(2):88-95. https://doi.org/10.4103/1110-1148.165881
15. Prudnikova O.G., Khomchenkov M.V. Post-traumatic deformities of the spine: relevance, problems, and revision surgery. Russian Journal of Spine Surgery (Khirurgiya Pozvonochnika). 2019;16(4):36-44. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.14531/ss2019.4.36-44
16. Borzykh K.O., Rerikh V.V. Surgical treatment of posttraumatic kyphosis of the lumbar spine: compensatory changes and dynamics of sagittal balance. Russian Journal of Spine Surgery (Khirurgiya Pozvonochnika). 2024;21(4):34-45. (In Russ.). ttps://doi.org/10.14531/ss2024.4.34-45
17. Rerikh V.V., Borzykh K.O. Staged surgical treatment of posttraumatic deformities in the thoracic and lumbar spine. Russian Journal of Spine Surgery (Khirurgiya Pozvonochnika). 2016;13(4):21-27. https://doi.org/10.14531/ss2016.4.21-27
18. Bianco K, Norton R, Schwab F, et al. Complications and intercenter variability of three-column osteotomies for spinal deformity surgery: a retrospective review of 423 patients. Neurosurg Focus. 2014;36(5):E18. PMID: 24785483. https://doi.org/10.3171/2014.2.focus1422
19. Auerbach JD, Lenke LG, Bridwell KH, et al. Major complications and comparison between 3-column osteotomy techniques in 105 consecutive spinal deformity procedures. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2012;37(14):1198-1210. PMID: 22366971. https://doi.org/10.1097/brs.0b013e31824fffde
Review
For citations:
Afaunov A.A., Chaikin N.S., Basankin I.V., Ageev M.Yu., Filatova E.E. The Predictors of Surgical Complications in the Treatment of Patients with Post-Traumatic Deformities of the Lower Thoracic and Lumbar Spine. Innovative Medicine of Kuban. 2026;11(1):35-44. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.35401/2541-9897-2026-11-1-35-44
JATS XML




























