Influence of suction on prolonged air leak after VATS lobectomies: a prospective randomized study
https://doi.org/10.35401/2500-0268-2020-20-4-14-19
Abstract
Background. Prolonged air leak is the most common postoperative complication following lung resection. Despite the huge number of researches concerning this problem, no consensus exists regarding the choice of the appropriate method of pleural space drainage after thoracoscopic surgery.
Objective. To compare suction and water-seal regarding their influence on the incidence of prolonged air leak.
Material and Methods. This prospective randomized trial included sixty patients who underwent VATS lobectomies on different diagnoses in the Center for Thoracic Surgery, Clinical Hospital no. 122 (St. Petersburg) from September 2018 until May 2020. The open-label randomized controlled trial involved two groups: control group (water-seal drainage) and suction group. Each group consisted of thirty patients. Ten patients were discharged with a Heimlich valve.
Results. The incidence of prolonged air leak was 23%. Patients in the suction group had a higher duration of air leak than those in the control group (5.3 ± 1.3 vs 3.7 ± 0.9 days, р = 0.04). The number of air leak cases was slightly higher in the suction group (8 and 6 patients); however, the difference was not significant (р = 0.57). Both groups had no difference in the number of complications (р = 0.2). There were no cases of reoperation.
Discussion. The advantage of water-seal is a lower risk of parenchymal defects. Suction may increase holes in visceral pleura, cause hyperexudation, leading to prolonged duration of drainage. At the same time, the use of suction may decrease residual pleural spaces, match visceral and parietal pleura, which may decrease the duration of air leak. A lot of studies on this issue was performed, however, their results are contradictory.
Conclusion. Drainage of pleural space after VATS lobectomies may be safely performed with water-seal. In the case of increasing surgical emphysema or appearance of progressive dyspnea, suction should be applied
About the Authors
O. S. MaslakRussian Federation
Olga S. Maslak, PhD student, Faculty of Medicine
Universitetskaya naberezhnaya, 7/9, St. Petersburg, 199034
V. G. Pischik
Russian Federation
Vadim G. Pischik, Dr. of Sci. (Med.), Professor, Faculty of Medicine; Chief of the Center for Thoracic Surgery; Deputy Chief Physician for Surgery
St. Petersburg
A. D. Obornev
Russian Federation
Aleksandr D. Obornev, Cand. of Sci. (Med.), Thoracic Surgeon
St. Petersburg
E. I. Zinchenko
Russian Federation
Evgenii I. Zinchenko, Cand. of Sci. (Med.), Assistant Professor, Faculty of Medicine; Thoracic Surgeon
St. Petersburg
A. I. Kovalenko
Russian Federation
Aleksandr I. Kovalenko, Thoracic Surgeon
St. Petersburg
References
1. Wood D, Lauer L, Layton A, Tong K. Prolonged length of stay associated with air leak following pulmonary resection has a negative impact on hospital margin. Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2016;8:187–95. PMID: 27274293. PMCID: PMC4876678. https://doi.org/10.2147/CEOR.S95603 [erratum in: Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2016;8:351. PMID: 27471401. PMCID: PMC4948683. https://doi.org/10.2147/CEOR.S113233]
2. Brunelli A, Monteverde M, Borri A, Salati M, Marasco M, Fianchini A. Predictors of prolonged air leak after pulmonary lobectomy. Ann Thorac Surg. 2004;77:1205–10. PMID: 15063235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2003.10.082
3. Isowa N, Hasegawa S, Bando T, Wada H. Preoperative risk factors for prolonged air leak following lobectomy or segmentectomy for primary lung cancer. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2002;21:951. PMID: 12062302. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1010-7940(02)00076-3
4. Mueller MR, Marzluf BA. The anticipation and management of air leaks and residual spaces post lung resection. J Thorac Dis. 2014;6:271–84. PMID: 24624291. PMCID: PMC3949188. https://doi.org/10.3978/j.issn.2072-1439.2013.11.29
5. Yan TD, Cao C, D’Amico TA, et al. Viseo-assisted thoracoscopic surgery lobectomy at 20 years: a consensus statement. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2014;45:633–9. PMID: 24130372. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejcts/ezt463
6. Fernandez FG, Falcoz PE, Kozower BD, et al. The Society of Thoracic Surgeons and the European Society of Thoracic Surgeons general thoracic surgery databases: joint standardization of variable definitions and terminology. Ann Thorac Surg. 2015;99:368–76. PMID: 25555970. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2014.05.104
7. Seely AJE, Ivanovic J, Threader J, et al. Systematic classification of morbidity and mortality after thoracic surgery. Ann Thorac Surg. 2010;90:936–42. PMID: 20732521. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2010.05.014
8. Cooper JD, Patterson GA, Sundaresan RS, et al. Results of 150 consecutive bilateral lung volume reduction procedures in patients with severe emphysema. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1996;112:1319–30. PMID: 8911330. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5223(96)70147-2
9. Cerfolio RJ, Bass C, Katholi CR. Prospective randomised trial compares suction versus water seal for air leaks. Ann Thorac Surg. 2001;71:1613–7. PMID: 11383809. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0003-4975(01)02474-2
10. Brunelli A, Sabbatini A, Xiume F, Refai MA, Salati M, Marasco R. Alternative suction reduces prolonged air leak after pulmonary lobectomy: a randomized comparison versus water seal. Ann Thorac Surg. 2005;80:1052–5. PMID: 16122484. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2005.03.073
11. Ayed AK. Suction versus water seal after thoracoscopy for primary spontaneous pneumothorax: prospective randomized study. Ann Thorac Surg. 2003;75:1593–6. PMID: 12735584. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0003-4975(02)04894-4
12. Leo F, Duranti L, Girelli L, et al. Does external pleural suction reduce prolonged air leak after lung resection? Results from the AirINTrial after 500 randomized cases. Ann Thorac Surg. 2013;96:1234–9. PMID: 23866802. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2013.04.079
13. Deng B, Tan Q-Yu, Zhao Yu-P, Wang R-W, Jiang Ya-G. Suction or non-suction to the underwater seal drains following pulmonary operation: meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2010;38:210–5. PMID: 20194027. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejcts.2010.01.050
14. Lang P, Manickavasagar M, Burdett C, et al. Suction on chest drains following lung resection: evidence and practice are not aligned. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2015;49:611–6. PMID: 25870218. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejcts/ezv133
15. Zhou J, Chen N, Hai Y, et al. External suction versus simple water-seal on chest drainage following pulmonary surgery: an updated meta-analysis. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2018;28:29–36. https://doi.org/10.1093/icvts/ivy216
16. Sanni A, Critchley A, Dunning J. Should chest drains be put on suction or not following pulmonary lobectomy? Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2006;5:275–8. PMID: 17670567. https://doi.org/10.1510/icvts.2006.130559
Review
For citations:
Maslak O.S., Pischik V.G., Obornev A.D., Zinchenko E.I., Kovalenko A.I. Influence of suction on prolonged air leak after VATS lobectomies: a prospective randomized study. Innovative Medicine of Kuban. 2020;(4):14-19. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.35401/2500-0268-2020-20-4-14-19