Quantitative visualization assessment of the vascular wall in patients with surgical pathology of the aortic valve, aorta and brachiocephalic arteries
https://doi.org/10.35401/2541-9897-2022-25-4-5-13
Abstract
Objective: Identification of the quantitative characteristics of changes in the arterial wall according to ultrasound, CT and MRI; development of the roadmap for the use of radiology diagnostic methods.
Material and methods: 548 studies of 483 patients with atherosclerosis were analyzed (15 ultrasound studies, 483 – CTA and 50 – MRI). In the comparison group (n = 17) in patients without atherosclerosis, an analysis of MRI data of the aortic wall was performed. According to CTA, signs of atherosclerotic degeneration were assessed. According to the MRI data, indicators of aortic distensibility, Young’s modulus of the aortic wall (MPa), systolic distension of the aorta (ml), aortic wall enhancement index during contrast enhancement were calculated.
Results: During the performance of ultrasound in all cases (n = 15), the analysis of the elastic properties of the aortic wall is difficult due to the artifact from calcification. Adverse CT signs of the occurrence of intraoperative vascular complications: the presence of an intraluminal thrombus, an uneven internal aortic contour of more than half of the circumference with an aortic wall thickness of more than 5 mm. According to MRI data in patients with atherosclerosis, aortic distensibility was reduced to 14.42 ± 2.95%, Young’s modulus for the aortic wall was 0.77 ± 0.26 MPa, the index of contrast enhancement of the aortic wall was 1.73 ± 0.5, the volume of systolic aortic distension was 11.48 ± 1.84 ml. In patients with vascular events in the perioperative period, systolic aortic dilatation was 9.2 ml.
Conclusion: The signs which are expedient to consider when making a decision on surgical treatment have been identified. Significant limitations were identified in the assessment of elasticity by ultrasound. The wider use of MRI in atherosclerotic lesions looks promising.
Keywords
About the Authors
T. A. BergenRussian Federation
Tatiana A. Bergen, Dr. Sci. (Med.), Head of the Research Department of Radiology and Instrumental Diagnostics, Professor of the Department of Higher and Additional Professional Education, Radiologist
15, Rechkunovskaya str., Novosibirsk, 630055
E. I. Zyablova
Russian Federation
Elena I. Zyablova, Cand. Sci. (Med.), Head of Radiology Department; Head of Radiodiagnosis Department no. 2, Faculty of Advanced Training and Professional Retraining of Specialists
Krasnodar
A. R. Tarkova
Russian Federation
Alexandra R. Tarkova, Cand. Sci. (Med.), Doctor of Functional Diagnostics, Leading Researcher, Research Department of Radiology and Instrumental Diagnostics
15, Rechkunovskaya str., Novosibirsk, 630055
E. Kobelev
Russian Federation
Evgeny Kobelev, Junior Researcher, Research Department of Radiology and Instrumental Diagnostics, Radiologist
15, Rechkunovskaya str., Novosibirsk, 630055
I. G. Nosulya
Russian Federation
Irina G. Nosulya, Radiologist; Assistant, Radiodiagnosis Department no. 2, Faculty of Advanced Training and Professional Retraining of Specialists
Krasnodar
N. T. Pak
Russian Federation
Natalya T. Pak, Cand. Sci. (Med.), Researcher, Research Department of Radiology and Instrumental Diagnostics, Radiologist
15, Rechkunovskaya str., Novosibirsk, 630055
V. E. Sinitsyn
Russian Federation
Valentin E. Sinitsyn, Dr. Sci. (Med.), Professor, Department of Multidisciplinary Clinical Training, Head of the Course of Radiology and Radiation Therapy
Moscow
A. M. Chernyavsky
Russian Federation
Alexander M. Chernyavsky, Dr. Sci. (Med.), Professor, Corresponding Member of the Russian Academy of Sciences, General Director
15, Rechkunovskaya str., Novosibirsk, 630055
V. Yu. Usov
Russian Federation
Vladimir Yu. Usov, Dr. Sci. (Med.), Professor, Leading Researcher
Tomsk
References
1. Yasakova EP, Pykhteev VS, Belash SA, et al. Multispiral computer tomography in diagnostics of patients with the pathology of ascending department of the aorta in before and postoperative period. Diagnostic radiology and radiotherapy. 2018;(3):28–35. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.22328/2079-5343-2018-9-3-28-35
2. Stakhneva EM, Mescheryakova IA, Demidov EA, et al. A comparison of the protein composition from coronary atherosclerotic plaque at different stages of development. Molecular medicine. 2021;5:58–64. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.29296/24999490-2021-05-09
3. Skripnik AYu, Fokin VA, Mironchuk RR, et al. Assessment of the elastic properties of the ascending aorta using electrocardiographic synchronized computed tomography angiography with advanced data processing. Russian Journal of Cardiology. 2019;24(12):48–54. (In Russ.). http://dx.doi.org/10.15829/1560-4071-2019-12-48-54
4. Usov VYu, Ignatenko GA, Bergen TA, et al. Computational evaluation of mechano-elastic properties and of paramagnetic contrast enhancement of thoracic aortic wall in acute myocardial infarction and in non-coronarogenic myocardial damage, from the data of dynamic ECG-gated MRI (MR-elastometry). Translational Medicine. 2021;8(6):43–58. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.18705/2311-4495-2021-6-43-58
5. Golukhova EZ, Shavman MG, Shurupova IV, et al. Characteristics of myocardial blood flow and coronary flow reserve by PET/CT in patients with coronary artery disease with different degrees of coronary artery stenosis. REJR. 2021;11(3):67–83. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.21569/2222-7415-2021-11-3-67-83
6. Pak NT, Kobelev E, Usov VYu, et al. Evaluation of the severity of atherosclerotic degeneration of the aortic arch wall using computed tomographic angiography to predict the risk of stroke in patients with carotid stenosis in the early postoperative period. Creative Cardiology. 2022;16(1):77–91. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.24022/1997-3187-2022-16-1-77-91
7. Usov VYu, Plotnikov MP, Del OA, et al. Contrast-enhanced MRI of the aortic wall in the efficiency evaluation of ethylmethylhydroxypyridine succinate (mexidol) long-term use to prevent aortic atherosclerosis progression. Journal of new medical technologies. 2018;25(1):125–132. (In Russ.). http://dx.doi.org/10.24411/1609-2163-2018-15973
8. Vrublevsky AV, Boshchenko AA, Bogdanov YuI. Possibilities and limitations of three-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography in the diagnosis of thoracic aorta atherosclerosis. Cardiology. 2019;59(10S):22–30. (In Russ.). http://dx.doi.org/10.18087/cardio.n692
9. Vasyuk YuA, Ivanova SV, Shkolnik EL, et al. Consensus of Russian experts on the evaluation of arterial stiffness in clinical practice. Cardiovascular Therapy and Prevention. 2016:15(2):4–19. (In Russ.). http://dx.doi.org/10.15829/1728-8800-2016-2-4-19
10. Pryamikov AD, Mironkov AB, Khripun AI. Surgical treatment of tandem stenosis of the internal carotid artery. Circulation Pathology and Cardiac Surgery. 2021;25(3):20–26. (In Russ.). http://dx.doi.org/10.21688/1681-3472-2021-3-20-26
Review
For citations:
Bergen T.A., Zyablova E.I., Tarkova A.R., Kobelev E., Nosulya I.G., Pak N.T., Sinitsyn V.E., Chernyavsky A.M., Usov V.Yu. Quantitative visualization assessment of the vascular wall in patients with surgical pathology of the aortic valve, aorta and brachiocephalic arteries. Innovative Medicine of Kuban. 2022;(4):5-13. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.35401/2541-9897-2022-25-4-5-13