Role of Contrast-Enhanced MRI in Diagnosing Brain Metastases in Patients With Lung Cancer
https://doi.org/10.35401/2541-9897-2023-8-4-74-81
Abstract
Introduction: Lung cancer is one of the most common cancers in the world. Approximately 40% of all metastases make up brain metastases that occur in 3% of patients at early stages of lung cancer. Early diagnosis of brain metastases directly affects patients’ survival and quality of life.
Objective: To study the role of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in detecting brain metastases at the outpatient stage in patients with newly diagnosed and histologically confirmed lung cancer and to compare the findings to that of computed tomography (CT).
Materials and methods: Our study was conducted at the premises of the Scientific Research Institute – Ochapovsky Regional Clinical Hospital No. 1 (Krasnodar, Russian Federation) between November 2022 and January 2023. Seventyfive patients with histologically confirmed lung cancer underwent brain MRI on a Philips Panorama 1.0T MRI scanner and intravenous administration of Clariscan to detect metastatic lesions. As a diagnostic method, we used a “short” scanning protocol in T1-WI (TR: 450, TE: 15, slice thickness 5 mm), T2-WI (TR: 4533, TE: 100, slice thickness 5 mm) and DWI (TR: 3712, TE: 97, slice thickness 5 mm) modes in the axial plane, then the Clariscan contrast agent was injected intravenously at the rate of 0.2 ml per 1 kg of the patient's weight, after which the scan was repeated using 3D T1 (TR: 450, TE: 15, slice thickness 1 mm).
Results: The average age of the patients was 60 years. The majority of the participants were male. Of all the patients, the majority had central lung cancer (57.3%). During contrast-enhanced brain MRI, brain metastases that accumulated a contrast agent in 100% of cases were detected in 30 patients (40%) of the total number of patients. In 7% of the patients, there were non-metastatic findings undetected by prior contrast-enhanced CT, such as pontine cavernoma and venous malformations. After MRI for brain metastases, management strategies changed in 30 (40%) patients.
Discussion: Contrast-enhanced MRI is one of the most effective methods for diagnosing metastatic lesions. It allows to localize brain metastases and helps the clinician choose the most effective management strategy. The introduction of contrast-enhanced brain MRI into routine medical practice could improve the accuracy and quality of brain metastasis detection in patients with lung cancer.
About the Authors
D. O. KardailskayaRussian Federation
Daria O. Kardailskaya, Radiologist; Assistant Professor at Diagnostic Radiology Department No. 2
ulitsa 1 Maya 167, Krasnodar, 350086
I. G. Nosulia
Russian Federation
Irina G. Nosulia, Radiologist; Assistant Professor at Diagnostic Radiology Department No. 2
Krasnodar
E. I. Zyablova
Russian Federation
Elena I. Zyablova, Cand. Sci. (Med.), Head of the Radiology Unit; Associate Professor at the Diagnostic Radiology Department
Krasnodar
E. B. Orlova
Russian Federation
Ekaterina B. Orlova, Radiologist; Assistant Professor at Diagnostic Radiology Department No. 2
Krasnodar
S. G. Gvindzhiia
Russian Federation
Sariia G. Gvindzhiia, Radiologist; Assistant Professor at Diagnostic Radiology Department No. 2
Krasnodar
A. N. Popova
Russian Federation
Anastasia N. Popova, Radiologist; Assistant Professor at Diagnostic Radiology Department No. 2
Krasnodar
V. A. Porhanov
Russian Federation
Vladimir A. Porhanov, Academician of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Dr. Sci. (Med.), Professor, Chief Physician; Head of the Oncology Department with the Thoracic Surgery Course, Faculty of Continuing Professional Development and Retraining
Krasnodar
References
1. Azenha LF, Bertoglio P, Kestenholz P, et al. Role of preoperative brain imaging in patients with NSCLC stage I: a retrospective, multicenter analysis. Cancers (Basel). 2022;14(10):2419. PMID: 35626022. PMCID: PMC9140138. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers14102419
2. Jünger ST, Hoyer UCI, Schaufler D, et al. Fully automated MR detection and segmentation of brain metastases in non-small cell lung cancer using deep learning. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2021;54(5):1608–1622. PMID: 34032344. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.27741
3. Moon WJ, Cho YA, Hahn S, Son HM, Woo SK, Lee YH. The pattern of use, effectiveness, and safety of gadoteric acid (Clariscan) in patients undergoing contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging: a prospective, multicenter, observational study. Contrast Media Mol Imaging. 2021;2021:4764348. PMID: 34803545. PMCID: PMC8572637. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/4764348
4. Association of Oncologists of Russia, Russian Society of Clinical Oncology. Clinical Guidelines. Malignant Neoplasm of the Bronchus and Lung (2021). Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation. Accessed May 2, 2023. (In Russ.). https://oncologyassociation.ru/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/rak-legkogo-2021.pdf
5. Zhuge L, Huang Y, Wang S, et al. Preoperative brain MRI for clinical stage IA lung cancer: is routine scanning rational?. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2019;145(2):503–509. PMID: 30536037. PMCID: PMC6373267. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00432-018-2814-2
6. Khosla A. Brain Metastasis Imaging. Medscape. Updated August 24, 2022. Accessed May 2, 2023. https://emedicine.medscape.com/article/338239-overview#a1
7. Princess Margaret Cancer Centre Clinical Practice Guidelines. Central Nervous System, Brain Metastases. Princess Margaret Cancer Centre; 2019. Accessed May 2, 2023. https://www.uhn.ca/PrincessMargaret/Health_Professionals/Programs_Departments/Documents/CPG_CNS_BrainMetastases.pdf
8. Heshmatzadeh Behzadi A, McDonald J. Gadoliniumbased contrast agents for imaging of the central nervous system: a multicenter European prospective study. Medicine (Baltimore). 2022;101(34):e30163. PMID: 36042629. PMCID: PMC9410688. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000030163
9. Sui L, Chang S, Xue L, et al. Deep learning based on enhanced MRI T1 imaging to differentiate small-cell and non-smallcell primary lung cancers in patients with brain metastases. Curr Med Imaging. 2023;19(13):1541–1548. PMID: 36717988. https://doi.org/10.2174/1573405619666230130124408
10. Huynh K, Baghdanian AH, Baghdanian AA, Sun DS, Kolli KP, Zagoria RJ. Updated guidelines for intravenous contrast use for CT and MRI. Emerg Radiol. 2020;27(2):115–126. PMID: 31925592. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10140-020-01751-y
11. Murphy KJ, Brunberg JA, Cohan RH. Adverse reactions to gadolinium contrast media: a review of 36 cases. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1996;167(4):847–849. PMID: 8819369. https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.167.4.8819369
12. Talmon A, Tal Y, Moss J, et al. Clinical impact of allergy and pre-medication in CT studies with low-osmolality intravenous iodinated contrast media. Clin Radiol. 2022;77(3):210–215. PMID: 34973806. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crad.2021.12.009
13. Vitali P, Savoldi F, Segati F, et al. MRI versus CT in the detection of brain lesions in patients with infective endocarditis before or after cardiac surgery. Neuroradiology. 2022;64(5):905–913. PMID: 34647143. PMCID: PMC9005423. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00234-021-02810-y
Review
For citations:
Kardailskaya D.O., Nosulia I.G., Zyablova E.I., Orlova E.B., Gvindzhiia S.G., Popova A.N., Porhanov V.A. Role of Contrast-Enhanced MRI in Diagnosing Brain Metastases in Patients With Lung Cancer. Innovative Medicine of Kuban. 2023;(4):74-81. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.35401/2541-9897-2023-8-4-74-81