Preview

Innovative Medicine of Kuban

Advanced search

Comparative Analysis of Short-Term Outcomes of Anatomical Lung Resections Using Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery and Thoracotomy Approaches

https://doi.org/10.35401/2541-9897-2024-9-1-18-27

Abstract

Objective: To analyze short-term outcomes of anatomical lung resections using video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) and thoracotomy approaches.

Materials and methods: Our retrospective study included 530 patients who underwent surgery for various lung diseases in the thoracic surgery unit of City Multidisciplinary Hospital No. 2 (Saint Petersburg, Russian Federation) between 2014 and 2021. The patients were grouped based on the surgical approach: group 1 for patients who underwent VATS (n = 378), group 2 for patients who underwent thoracotomy (n = 120), and group 3 for patients who underwent conversion from VATS to thoracotomy (n = 32).

Results: Tumor size, paranodal and peribronchial changes were unfavorable prognostic factors for conversion from VATS to thoracotomy (odds ratio [OR] = 1.032, CI: 1.013-1.051, P < .001; OR = 4.416, CI: 2.100-9.283, P < .0005; OR = 3.109, CI: 1.496-6.462, P < .002). Patients from group 1 and group 3 mostly had minor complications, whereas 32 patients (53%) from group 2 developed grade III-V complications according to Thoracic Morbidity and Mortality classification system. High Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), thoracotomy approach, emphysematous changes, adhesions, and absence of interlobar fissures were independent unfavorable prognostic factors for complications in the early postoperative period (OR = 1.665, CI: 1.031-2.691, P < .05; OR = 1.874, CI: 1.1433.070, P < .05; OR = 1.8803, CI: 1.126-2.888, P < .05; OR = 1.548, CI: 1.010-2.370, P < .05; OR = 1.612, CI: 1.053-2.466, P < .05).

Conclusions: VATS is an effective and safe approach for anatomical lung resection. Tumor size above 40 mm, significant paranodal and peribronchial changes were risk factors for conversion from VATS to thoracotomy. CCI above 5, thoracotomy approach, emphysematous changes, adhesions, and absence of interlobar fissures were independent unfavorable prognostic factors for complications in the early postoperative period.

About the Authors

M. A. Atyukov
City Multidisciplinary Hospital No. 2
Russian Federation

Mikhail A. Atyukov, Cand. Sci. (Med.), Thoracic Surgeon, Head of the Thoracic Surgery Unit

Saint Petersburg



I. Yu. Zemtsova
City Multidisciplinary Hospital No. 2; Saint Petersburg State University
Russian Federation

Irina Yu. Zemtsova, Cand. Sci. (Med.), Assistant Professor at the Hospital Surgery Department, Faculty of Medicine, Saint Petersburg State University; Thoracic Surgeon, City Multidisciplinary Hospital No. 2 

City Multidisciplinary Hospital No. 2, pereulok Uchebnyi 5, Saint Petersburg, 194354, Russian Federation



A. S. Petrov
City Multidisciplinary Hospital No. 2; Saint Petersburg State University
Russian Federation

Andrey S. Petrov, Cand. Sci. (Med.), Associate Professor at the Hospital Surgery Department, Faculty of Medicine, Saint Petersburg State University; Thoracic Surgeon, City Multidisciplinary Hospital No. 2

Saint Petersburg



O. A. Zhemchugova-Zelenova
Saint Petersburg State University
Russian Federation

Olga A. Zhemchugova-Zelenova, Postgraduate Student, Hospital Surgery Department, Faculty of Medicine

Saint Petersburg 



P. K. Yablonskiy
City Multidisciplinary Hospital No. 2; Saint Petersburg State University; Saint Petersburg Research Institute of Phthisiopulmonology
Russian Federation

Petr K. Yablonskiy, Dr. Sci. (Med.), Professor, Director, Saint Petersburg Research Institute of Phthisiopulmonology; Head of the Hospital Surgery Department, Saint Petersburg State University; Thoracic Surgeon, City Multidisciplinary Hospital No. 2

Saint Petersburg



References

1. Kirby TJ, Mack MJ, Landreneau RJ, Rice TW. Initial experience with video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy. Ann Thorac Surg. 1993;56(6):1248–1253. PMID: 8267420. https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-4975(93)90661-z

2. McKenna RJ Jr. Thoracoscopic lobectomy with mediastinal sampling in 80-year-old patients. Chest. 1994;106(6):1902–1904. PMID: 7988225. https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.106.6.1902

3. Guerrera F, Olland A, Ruffi E, Falcoz PE. VATS lobectomy vs. open lobectomy for early-stage lung cancer: an endless question-are we close to a defi answer?. J Thorac Dis. 2019;11(12):5616–5618. PMID: 32030283. PMCID: PMC6988071. https://doi.org/10.21037/jtd.2019.12.19

4. Pishchik VG, Zinchenko EI, Obornev AD, Kovalenko AI. Video-assisted thoracoscopic anatomic lung resection: experience of 246 operations. Khirurgiia (Mosk). 2016;(1 Pt 2):10–15. (In Russ.). PMID: 26977763. https://doi.org/10.17116/hirurgia20161210-15

5. Rjabov AB, Pikin OV, Glushko VA, et al. Surgical treatment of lung cancer in patients over 75 years old. Khirurgiia (Mosk). 2022;(12):20–30. (In Russ.). PMID: 36469465. https://doi.org/10.17116/hirurgia202212120

6. Lim E, Harris RA, McKeon HE, et al. Impact of videoassisted thoracoscopic lobectomy versus open lobectomy for lung cancer on recovery assessed using self-reported physical function: VIOLET RCT. Health Technol Assess. 2022;26(48):1–162. PMID: 36524582. PMCID: PMC9791462. https://doi.org/10.3310/THBQ1793

7. Sekhniaidze DD, Petrov VG, Zuev VIu, et al. Videothoracoscopic lobectomy for early-stage lung cancer. Endoscopic Surgery. 2013;19(2):24–27. (In Russ.).

8. Porkhanov VA, Danilov VV, Polyakov IS, Kononenko VB, Zhikharev VA, Krygin SA. Minimally invasive thoracoscopic and robot-assisted lobectomy. Khirurgiia (Mosk). 2019;(8):46–52. (In Russ.). PMID: 31464274. https://doi.org/10.17116/hirurgia201908146

9. Yan TD, Cao C, D’Amico TA, et al; International VATS Lobectomy Consensus Group. Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery lobectomy at 20 years: a consensus statement. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2014;45(4):633–639. PMID: 24130372. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejcts/ezt463

10. Seely AJ, Ivanovic J, Threader J, et al. Systematic classification of morbidity and mortality after thoracic surgery. Ann Thorac Surg. 2010;90(3):936–942. PMID: 20732521. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2010.05.014

11. Bongiolatti S, Gonfiotti A, Viggiano D, et al; Italian VATS Group. Risk factors and impact of conversion from VATS to open lobectomy: analysis from a national database. Surg Endosc. 2019;33(12):3953–3962. Published correction appears in Surg Endosc. 2019 Jun 4. PMID: 30706153. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-019-06682-5

12. Fourdrain A, Georges O, Gossot D, et al. Patient risk factors for conversion during video-assisted thoracic surgery-the Epithor conversion score. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2022;62(3):ezac249. PMID: 35459942. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejcts/ezac249

13. Üçvet A, Yazgan S, Samancılar Ö, Türk Y, Gürsoy S, Erbaycu AE. Video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy and bilobectomy versus open thoracotomy for non-small cell lung cancer: mortality and survival. Turk Gogus Kalp Damar Cerrahisi Derg. 2022;30(1):66–74. PMID: 35444859. PMCID: PMC8990136. https://doi.org/10.5606/tgkdc.dergisi.2022.20912

14. Skorokhod A, Petrov A, Nefedov A, Kozak A, Atyukov M, Yablonskiy P. Video-assisted mediastinoscopic lymphadenectomy: technique and first results. MedAlliance. 2021;9(1):52–61. (In Russ.).

15. Gazala S, Hunt I, Valji A, Stewart K, Bédard ER. A method of assessing reasons for conversion during video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2011;12(6):962–964. PMID: 21388988. https://doi.org/10.1510/icvts.2010.259663

16. Yun JK, Park I, Kim HR, et al. Long-term outcomes of video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy for clinical N1 non-small cell lung cancer: a propensity score-weighted comparison with open thoracotomy. Lung Cancer. 2020;150:201–208. PMID: 33197685. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lungcan.2020.10.014

17. Kent MS, Hartwig MG, Vallières E, et al. Pulmonary Open, Robotic, and Thoracoscopic Lobectomy (PORTaL) study: an analysis of 5721 cases. Ann Surg. 2023;277(3):528–533. PMID: 34534988. PMCID: PMC9891268. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000005115

18. Kolařík J, Stolz A, Vachtenheim J, et al. Video-assisted and robotic-assisted thoracoscopic pulmonary lobectomies, our experience. Rozhl Chir. 2022;100(12):576–583. PMID: 35042342. https://doi.org/10.33699/PIS.2021.100.12.576-583

19. Gonfiotti A, Bongiolatti S, Borgianni S, et al. Development of a video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy program in a single institution: results before and after completion of the learning curve. J Cardiothorac Surg. 2016;11(1):130. PMID: 27496022. PMCID: PMC4974708. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13019-016-0526-8

20. Petersen RH, Hansen HJ. Learning curve associated with VATS lobectomy. Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2012;1(1):47–50. PMID: 23977465. PMCID: PMC3741706. https://doi.org/10.3978/j.issn.2225-319X.2012.04.05

21. Jeon YJ, Choi YS, Cho JH, et al. Thoracoscopic vs open surgery following neoadjuvant chemoradiation for clinical N2 lung cancer. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2022;34(1):300–308. PMID: 33444764. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.semtcvs.2021.01.002

22. Hireche K, Lounes Y, Bacri C, et al. VATS versus open lobectomy following induction therapy for stage III NSCLC: a propensity score-matched analysis. Cancers (Basel). 2023;15(2):414. PMID: 36672363. PMCID: PMC9857329. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers15020414

23. Puri V, Patel A, Majumder K, et al. Intraoperative conversion from video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery lobectomy to open thoracotomy: a study of causes and implications. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2015;149(1):55–62.e1. PMID: 25439768. PMCID: PMC4272658. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2014.08.074

24. Samson P, Guitron J, Reed MF, Hanseman DJ, Starnes SL. Predictors of conversion to thoracotomy for video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy: a retrospective analysis and the influence of computed tomography-based calcification assessment. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2013;145(6):1512–1518. PMID: 22698554. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2012.05.028

25. Byun CS, Lee S, Kim DJ, et al. Analysis of unexpected conversion to thoracotomy during thoracoscopic lobectomy in lung cancer. Ann Thorac Surg. 2015;100(3):968–973. PMID: 26188973. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2015.04.032


Review

For citations:


Atyukov M.A., Zemtsova I.Yu., Petrov A.S., Zhemchugova-Zelenova O.A., Yablonskiy P.K. Comparative Analysis of Short-Term Outcomes of Anatomical Lung Resections Using Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery and Thoracotomy Approaches. Innovative Medicine of Kuban. 2024;(1):18-27. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.35401/2541-9897-2024-9-1-18-27

Views: 397


ISSN 2541-9897 (Online)