Preview

Innovative Medicine of Kuban

Advanced search

Prediction of perioperative cardiac complications in patients with proximal femoral fracture

https://doi.org/10.35401/2500-0268-2020-19-3-6-11

Abstract

Background. Prediction of cardiac complications following orthopaedic and trauma surgery is necessary to improve the quality of treating the elderly patients.

Objective. To assess the effectiveness of prognostic scores of perioperative cardiac risk in patients with proximal femoral fracture.

Material and Methods. We retrospectively reviewed 918 hospital patients with proximal hip fracture from January, 1 2018 to December, 31 2019. Perioperative cardiac risks were assessed using the Goldman Risk Index, Revised Cardiac Risk Index (Lee Index) and Gupta Perioperative Cardiac Risk Index.

Results. Cardiac complications occurred in 7 (0.76%) of 918 patients, 6 (0.65%) patients developed acute myocardial infarction, 1 (0.11%) patient suffered from complete atrioventricular block. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis of the relationship between the time from injury to surgery and cardiovascular complications did not give statistically significant results (AUC (area under a curve) = 0.574, 95% CI (confidence interval): 0.352–0.796). When compared the presence of cardiac complications with the Lee Criteria predictions, significant differences were revealed (p = 0.007), and the Goldman Index data were not statistically significant (p = 0.151). The area under the ROC curve of the corresponding relationship between the prognosis of cardiac complications and the Gupta Index was 0.782 with 95% CI: 0.574–0.991 (p = 0.017), the sensitivity and specificity of the model were 83.3% and 70.4%, respectively.

Conclusion. The Goldman Index and Lee Index have no significant value for predicting perioperative cardiac complications in patients with proximal femoral fracture. The Gupta Index has an acceptable level of sensitivity and specificity in predicting cardiac complications.

About the Authors

B. S. Ezugbaia
Scientific Research Institute – Ochapovsky Regional Clinical Hospital no. 1
Russian Federation

Beka S. Ezugbaia, Anaesthesiologist and Reanimatologist of Department no. 6 

ul. 1 Maya, 167, Krasnodar, 350086



I. Yu. Sholin
Scientific Research Institute – Ochapovsky Regional Clinical Hospital no. 1
Russian Federation

Ivan Yu. Sholin, Cand. of Sci. (Med.), Head of Anaesthesiology and Reanimation Department no. 6

Krasnodar



V. A. Avetisian
Scientific Research Institute – Ochapovsky Regional Clinical Hospital no. 1
Russian Federation

Vaagn A. Avetisian, Anaesthesiologist and Reanimatologist of Department no. 6

Krasnodar



V. A. Koriachkin
St. Petersburg State Pediatric Medical University
Russian Federation

Viktor A. Koriachkin, Dr. of Sci. (Med.), Professor of V.I. Gordeev Department of Anaesthesiology, Reanimatology and Emergency Pediatrics

St. Petersburg



M. A. Dzhopua
Kuban State Medical University
Russian Federation

Maksim A. Dzhopua, Resident of Anaesthesiology, Resuscitation and Transfusiology Department for Advanced Training

Krasnodar



M. P. Pleten
Kuban State Medical University
Russian Federation

Maksim P. Pleten, Resident of Anaesthesiology, Resuscitation and Transfusiology Department for Advanced Training

Krasnodar



D. A. Baturin
Scientific Research Institute – Ochapovsky Regional Clinical Hospital no. 1
Russian Federation

Dmitry A. Baturin, Anaesthesiologist and Reanimatologist of Department no. 6

Krasnodar



D. I. Marapov
Kazan State Medical University
Russian Federation

Damir I. Marapov, Cand. of Sci. (Med.), Assistant of the Lean Technologies in Healthcare, an educational and methodological center

Kazan, Republic of Tatarstan



References

1. Meller MM, Toossi N, Gonzalez MH, Son MS, Lau EC, Johanson N. Surgical risks and costs of care are greater in patients who are super obese and undergoing THA. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016;474:2472–81. PMID: 27562787. PMCID: PMC5052212. doi:10.1007/s11999-016-5039-1

2. Webb ML, Golinvaux NS, Ibe IK, Bovonratwet P, Ellman MS, Grauer JN. Comparison of perioperative adverse event rates after total knee arthroplasty in patients with diabetes: insulin dependence makes a difference. J Arthroplasty. 2017;32:2947–51. PMID: 28559194. doi:10.1016/j.arth.2017.04.032

3. Łęgosz P, Kotkowski M, Płatek AE, et al. Assessment of cardiovascular risk in patients undergoing total joint alloplasty: the CRASH-JOINT study. Kardiol Pol. 2017;75:213–20. PMID: 27878804. doi:10.5603/kp.a2016.0162

4. Basilico FC, Sweeney G, Losina E, et al. Risk factors for cardiovascular complications following total joint replacement surgery. Arthritis Rheum. 2008;58:1915–20. PMID: 18576321. PMCID: PMC3256246. doi:10.1002/art.23607

5. Eagle KA, Berger PB, Calkins H, et al.; American College of Cardiology, American Heart Association. ACC/AHA guideline update for perioperative cardiovascular evaluation for noncardiac surgery – executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee to Update the 1996 Guidelines on Perioperative Cardiovascular Evaluation for Noncardiac Surgery). J Am Coll Cardiol. 2002;39:542– 53. PMID: 11823097. doi:10.1016/s0735-1097(01)01788-0. Erratum in: J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006;47:2356. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2006.05.008

6. Goldman L, Caldera DL, Nussbaum SR, et al. Multifactorial index of cardiac risk in noncardiac surgical procedures. N Engl J Med. 1977;297:845–50. PMID: 904659. doi:10.1056/nejm197710202971601

7. Goldman L. Multifactorial index of cardiac risk in noncardiac surgery: ten-year status report. J Cardiothorac Anesth. 1987;1:237–44. PMID: 2980950. doi:10.1016/s0888-6296(87)80011-x

8. Lee TH, Marcantonio ER, Mangione CM, et al. Derivation and prospective validation of a simple index for prediction of cardiac risk of major noncardiac surgery. Circulation. 1999;100:1043–9. PMID: 10477528. doi:10.1161/01.cir.100.10.1043

9. Gupta PK, Gupta H, Sundaram A, et al. Development and validation of a risk calculator for prediction of cardiac risk after surgery. Circulation. 2011;124:381–7. PMID: 21730309. doi:10.1161/circulationaha.110.015701

10. Belmont PJ Jr, Kusnezov NA, Dunn JC, Bader JO, Kilcoyne K, Waterman BR. Predictors of hospital readmission after total shoulder arthroplasty. Orthopedics. 2017;40:e1–e10. PMID: 27648576. doi:10.3928/01477447-20160915-06

11. Peterson B, Ghahramani M, Harris S, et al. Usefulness of the myocardial infarction and cardiac arrest calculator as a discriminator of adverse cardiac events after elective hip and knee surgery. Am J Cardiol. 2016;117:1992–5. PMID: 27131613. doi:10.1016/j.amjcard.2016.03.050

12. Shah ChK, Keswani A, Boodaie BD, Yao D-H, Koenig KM, Moucha CS. Myocardial infarction risk in arthroplasty vs arthroscopy: how much does procedure type matter? J Arthroplasty. 2017;32:246–51. PMID: 27480828. doi:10.1016/j.arth.2016.06.033

13. Feng B, Lin J, Jin J, Qian W, Cao Sh, Weng X. The effect of previous coronary artery revascularization on the adverse cardiac events ninety days after total joint arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2018;33:235–40. PMID: 28993080. doi:10.1016/j.arth.2017.08.011

14. Elsiwy Ya, Jovanovic I, Doma K, Hazratwala K, Letson H. Risk factors associated with cardiac complication after total joint arthroplasty of the hip and knee: a systematic review. J Orthop Surg Res. 2019;14:15. PMID: 30635012. PMCID: PMC6330438. doi:10.1186/s13018-018-1058-9

15. Al-Ani AN, Samuelsson B, Tidermark J, et al. Early operation on patients with a hip fracture improved the ability to return to independent living. A prospective study of 850 patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008;90:1436–42. PMID: 18594090. doi:10.2106/jbjs.g.00890

16. Writing Committee for the VISION Study Investigators; Devereaux PJ, Biccard BM, Sigamani A, et al. Association of postoperative high-sensitivity troponin levels with myocardial injury and 30-day mortality among patients undergoing noncardiac surgery. JAMA. 2017;317:1642–51. PMID: 28444280. doi:10.1001/jama.2017.4360

17. Vlisides Ph, Mashour GA. Perioperative stroke. Can J Anaesth. 2016;63:193–204. PMID: 26391795. PMCID: PMC4720532. doi:10.1007/s12630-015-0494-9

18. Smeltz AM, Kolarczyk LM, Isaak RS. Update on perioperative pulmonary embolism management: a decision support tool to aid in diagnosis and treatment. Adv Anesth. 2017;35:213– 28. PMID: 29103574. doi:10.1016/j.aan.2017.08.001

19. Myocardial injury after noncardiac surgery: a large, international, prospective cohort study establishing diagnostic criteria, characteristics, predictors, and 30-day outcomes. Appendix 1. The vascular events in noncardiac surgery patients cohort evaluation (VISION) study investigators writing group. Anesthesiology. 2014;120:564–78. PMID: 24534856. doi:10.1097/ALN.0000000000000113

20. Sessler DI, Khanna AK. Perioperative myocardial injury and the contribution of hypotension. Intensive Care Med. 2018;44:811–22. PMID: 29868971. doi:10.1007/s00134-018-5224-7


Review

For citations:


Ezugbaia B.S., Sholin I.Yu., Avetisian V.A., Koriachkin V.A., Dzhopua M.A., Pleten M.P., Baturin D.A., Marapov D.I. Prediction of perioperative cardiac complications in patients with proximal femoral fracture. Innovative Medicine of Kuban. 2020;(3):6-11. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.35401/2500-0268-2020-19-3-6-11

Views: 1091


ISSN 2541-9897 (Online)