Comparative study of minimally invasive and traditional approaches for the microsurgical treatment of circle of Willis unruptured intracranial aneurysms

Objective. The study objective was to compare the effects of minimally invasive and traditional surgical approaches for treating patients with unruptured intracranial aneurysms (UIAs) to assess efficacy and safety of the keyhole concept in neurosurgery.

Material and Methods. We conducted a comparative analysis of the microsurgical treatment outcomes of 204 patients harbouring UIAs who were operated on from 2014 to 2019. Patients were divided into two groups: operated on using traditional approach (n = 85, 41.7%) and minimally invasive approach (n = 119, 58.3%). Patients of the first group were operated on using pterional (n = 31), orbitozygomatic (n = 16) and lateral supraorbital (n = 38) approaches; in the second group, patients underwent surgery using trans-eyebrow supraorbital (n = 35), minimal pterional (n = 38), trans-eyebrow transorbital (n = 20) and transpalpebral transorbital (n = 26) approaches. Rate of intraoperative and postoperative complications, surgery duration and postoperative in-hospital stay period were the factors to compare. The Modified Rankin Scale was used as a neurological outcomes measure. Also cosmetic results of surgery, hypesthesia from the site of the surgical approach, temporomandibular joint disorder and facial asymmetry were evaluated.

Results. Compared to the traditional approach, minimally invasive technique incurred shorter surgery duration (р = 0.051) and inpatient stay (р > 0.001). Intraoperative and postoperative complication rates (р > 0.05) as well as functional outcomes (р > 0.05) were comparable between the two groups, while cosmetic effects (р < 0.05) were greater in minimally invasive group of UIA patients.

Conclusion. Microsurgical treatment of UIA patients using minimally invasive approach is considered safe and effective. Adequate selection of patients for operation and exhaustive neuroimaging data assessment for choosing of neurosurgical technique are obligatory factors for keyhole surgery. The authors recommend using minimally invasive concept only for experienced neurosurgical teams in specialized clinics.

1. Nakagawa T, Hashi K. The incidence and treatment of asymptomatic, unruptured cerebral aneurysms. J Neurosurg. 1994;80:217–23. PMID: 8283259. doi:10.3171/jns.1994.80.2.0217

2. van Rooij WJ, Sluzewski M. Procedural morbidity and mortality of elective coil treatment of unruptured intracranial aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2006;27:1678–80. PMID: 16971613. Accessed from: http://www.ajnr.org/content/27/8/1678

3. White PM, Wardlaw JM. Unruptured intracranial aneurysms. J Neuroradiol. 2003;30:336–50. PMID: 14752379.

4. Song J, Kim B-S, Shin YoS. Treatment outcomes of unruptured intracranial aneurysms; experience of 1231 consecutive aneurysms. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2015;157:1303–11. PMID: 26055578. doi:10.1007/s00701-015-2460-2

5. King JT Jr, Berlin JA, Flamm ES. Morbidity and mortality from elective surgery for asymptomatic, unruptured, intracranial aneurysms: a meta-analysis. J Neurosurg. 1994;81:837–42. PMID: 7965113. doi:10.3171/jns.1994.81.6.0837

6. Raaymakers TW, Rinkel GJ, Limburg M, Algra A. Mortality and morbidity of surgery for unruptured intracranial aneurysms: a meta-analysis. Stroke. 1998;29:1531–8. PMID: 9707188. doi:10.1161/01.str.29.8.1531

7. Lall RL, Eddleman CS, Bendok BR, Batjer HH. Unruptured intracranial aneurysms and the assessment of rupture risk based on anatomical and morphological factors: sifting through the sands of data. Neurosurg Focus. 2009;26(5):E2. PMID: 19408998. doi:10.3171/2009.2.FOCUS0921

8. Ajiboye N, Chalouhi N, Starke RM, Zanaty M, Bell R. Unruptured cerebral aneurysms: evaluation and management. The Scientific World Journal. 2015;954954. PMID: 26146657. PMCID: PMC4471401. doi:10.1155/2015/954954

9. Aghakhani N, Vaz G, David Ph, et al. Surgical management of unruptured intracranial aneurysms that are inappropriate for endovascular treatment: experience based on two academic centers. Neurosurgery. 2008;62:1227–35. PMID: 18824989. doi:10.1227/01.neu.0000333294.52115.28

10. Hwang JC, Hyun MK, Lee HJ, et al. Endovascular coiling versus neurosurgical clipping in patients with unruptured intracranial aneurysm: a systematic review. BMC Neurol. 2012;12:99. PMID: 22998483. PMCID: PMC3519507. doi:10.1186/1471-2377-12-99

11. Kheyreddin AS, Eliava ShSh, Yakovlev SB, et al. Tactics of surgical treatment in patients with unruptured asymptomatic cerebral aneurysms. Zh Vopr Neirokhir Im N N Burdenko. 2016;80(5):32–43. (In Russ. and Eng.). PMID: 27801397. doi:10.17116/neiro201680532-43

12. Zweifel C, Sacho R, Tymianski R, Radovanovic I, Tymianski M. Safety, efficacy, and cost of surgery for patients with unrupruted aneurysms deemed unsuitable for endovascular therapy. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2015;157:2061–70. PMID: 26496925. doi:10.1007/s00701-015-2606-2

13. Alekseev AG, Pichugin AA, Danilov GV, Shayakhmetov NG, Danilov VI. A comparative study of the efficacy and safety of the eyebrow supraorbital approach in cerebral aneurysm surgery. Zh Vopr Neirokhir Im N N Burdenko. 2019;83(1):40–52. (In Russ. and Eng.). PMID: 30900687. doi:10.17116/neiro20198301140

14. Sakovich VP, Kolotvinov VS, Shamov AYu. Surgical treatment of intracranial aneurysms using the pterional approach via small burr holes. Zh Vopr Neirokhir Im N N Burdenko. 2000;1:3–7. (In Russ.).

15. Mori K, Wada K, Otani N, et al. Validation of effectiveness of keyhole clipping in nonfrail elderly patients with unruptured intracranial aneurysms. J Neurosurg. 2017;127:1307–14. PMID: 28059648. doi:10.3171/2016.9.JNS161634

16. Reisch R, Marcus H, Hugelshofer M, Koechlin NO, Stadie A, Kockro RA. Patients’ cosmetic satisfaction, pain, and functional outcomes after supraorbital craniotomy through an eyebrow incision. J Neurosurg. 2014;121:730–4. PMID: 24878288. doi:10.3171/2014.4.JNS13787

17. Dzhindzhikhadze RS, Dreval ON, Lazarev VA, Kambiev RL, Bogdanovich IO, Davudov AM. Keyhole-approaches for surgical treatment of cerebral aneurysms of anterior circulation. Russian Journal of Neurosurgery. 2017;1:23–31. (In Russ.).

18. Dzhindzhikhadze RS, Dreval ON, Lazarev VA, Kambiev RL. Transciliary supraorbital keyhole-approach as the method of choice for surgery of unruptured cerebral aneurysms of anterior circulation: clinical case, surgical technique, indications and contraindications. Russian Journal of Neurosurgery. 2017;1:23–31. (In Russ.).

19. Moskalev AV, Gladkikh VS, Alshevskaya AA, et al. Evidence-based medicine: opportunities of the Propensity Score Matching (PSM) method in eliminating selection bias in retrospective neurosurgical studies. Zh Vopr Neirokhir Im N N Burdenko. 2018;1:52–8. (In Russ.). PMID: 29543216. doi:10.17116/neiro201882152-58

20. Reisch R, Stadie A, Kockro RA, Hopf N. The keyhole concept in neurosurgery. World Neurosurg. 2013;79:s17.e9–13. PMID: 22381839. doi:10.1016/j.wneu.2012.02.024

21. Wong JHY, Tymanski R, Radovanovic I, Tymanski M. Minimally invasive microsurgery for cerebral aneurysms. Stroke. 2015;46:2699–706. PMID: 26304867. doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.115.008221

22. Wongsirisuwan M, Ananthanandorn A, Prachasinchai P. The comparison of conventional pterional and transciliary keyhole approaches: pro and con. J Med Assoc Thai. 2004;87:891–7. PMID: 15471292.

23. Paladino J, Mrak G, Miklić P, Jednacak H, Mihaljević D. The keyhole concept in aneurysm surgery – a comparative study: keyhole versus standard craniotomy. Minim Invasive Neurosurg. 2005;48:251–8. PMID: 16320184. doi:10.1055/s-2005-915599

24. Dzhindzhikhadze RS, Dreval ON, Lazarev VA, Polyakov AV. Transpalpebral approach in skull base surgery: how I do it. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2019;161:133–7. PMID: 30413939. doi:10.1007/s00701-018-3724-4

25. Tkachev VV, Kabdyba DV. The potentialities of neuroendoscopy in the course of non-traumatic intracranial hematomas. Russian Journal of Neurosurgery. 2005;2:45–51. (In Russ.).

26. Reisch R, Perneczky A. Ten-year experience with the supraorbital subfrontal approach through an eyebrow skin incision. Neurosurgery. 2005;57(4 Suppl):242–55. PMID: 16234671. doi:10.1227/01.neu.0000178353.42777.2c