МЕТОДИКА ИССЛЕДОВАНИЯ ПРЕПАРАТА ПОСЛЕ ХИРУРГИЧЕСКОГО ЛЕЧЕНИЯ РАКА ПРЯМОЙ КИШКИ: КАК МЫ ЭТО ДЕЛАЕМ
Аннотация
Об авторах
О. Н. ПонкинаРоссия
В. В. Половинкин
Россия
Список литературы
1. Heald R.J., Husband E.M., Ryall R.D. The mesorectum in rectal cancer surgery - the clue to pelvic recurrence? // Br. J. Surg. Vol. 69 (1982) P. 613 - 616.
2. Quirk P., Williams G.T. Minimum dataset for colorectal cancer histopathology reports. Royal College of Pathologist 2000. (www.rcpath.org).
3. Quirk P. Effect of the plane of surgery on local recurrence in patients with operable rectal cancer: a prospective study using data from the MRC CR07 and NCIC-CTG CO16 randomised clinical trial // Lancet 2009; 373: 821 - 28.
4. Hermanek P., Mansmann U., Staimmer D., et al. The German experience: the surgeon as a prognostic factor in colon and rectal cancer surgery // Surg Oncol Clin North Am. - 2000. - Vol. 9. - P. 33 - 49.
5. Nagtegaal ID., van Krieken JH. The role of pathologists in the quality control of diagnosis and treatment of rectal cancer - an overview // Eur J Cancer. - 2002. - 38(7). - P. 964 - 72.
6. Maslekar S., Sharma A., MacDonald A. et al. Mesorectal grades predict recurrences after curative resection for rectal cancer // Cancer Colon end Rectum. -2007. - Vol. 50. - № 1. - Р. 168 - 175.
7. Quirke P., Durdey P., Dixon MF., Williams NS. Local recurrence of rectal adenocarcinoma due to inadequate surgical resection. Histopathological study of lateral tumour spread and surgical excision // Lancet. -1986. - 2(8514). - P. 996 - 9.
8. Adam I., Mohamdee M., Martin I. Role of circumferential margin involvement in the local recurrence of rectal cancer // Lancet. - 1994. - 344. -P. 707 - 11.
9. Wibe A., Rendedal P.R., Svensson E. et al. Prognostic significance of the circumferential resection margin following total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer // Br. J. Surg. - 2002. - Vol. 89. - P. 327 - 334.
10. Nagtegaal I.D., Marijnen C.A., Kranenbarg E.K., van de Velde CJ. Circumferential margin involvement is still an important predictor of local recurrence in rectal carcinoma: not one millimeter but two millimeters is the limit // Am J Surg Pathol. - 2002. - 26(3). - P. 350 - 7.
11. Nagtegaal I.D., Quirke P. What is the role for the circumferential margin in the modern treatment of rectal cancer? // J Clin Oncol. - 2008. - 26. - P. 303 - 12.
12. Собин Л.Х., Госпадарович М.К., Виттекинд К. TNM Классификация злокачественых опухолей (7-е издание) // М.: Логосфера, 2011 - С. 275
13. Gooiker G.E.A., Kolfschoten N.T., Bastiannet E., Van De Velde C., Rosendaal F.R., Tollenaar R.A.E.V., Wouters M.W.J., Behalf O.N. Evaluating the validity of quality indicators for colorectal cancer care // J. Surg Oncol. - 2013. - 108. - P.465 - 571.
14. Tang L.H., Branton P., Burgart L.J., Carter D.K., Fitzgibbons P., Frankel W. L., Halling K.C., Jessup J., Kakar S., Minsky B., Nakhleh R., Washington K., Compton C.C. Protocol for the Examination of Specimens From Patients With Primary Carcinoma of the Colon and Rectum. College of American Pathologist 2016 (www.CAP.org).
15. Ryan R., Gibbons D., Hyland J.M.P., et al. Pathological response following long-course neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer. Histopathology. 2005; 47(2): 141 - 146. 30.
Рецензия
Для цитирования:
Понкина О.Н., Половинкин В.В. МЕТОДИКА ИССЛЕДОВАНИЯ ПРЕПАРАТА ПОСЛЕ ХИРУРГИЧЕСКОГО ЛЕЧЕНИЯ РАКА ПРЯМОЙ КИШКИ: КАК МЫ ЭТО ДЕЛАЕМ. Инновационная медицина Кубани. 2016;(4):23-29.
For citation:
Ponkina O.N., Polovinkin V.V. SPECIMEN EXAMINATION FOLLOWING SURGERY FOR RECTAL CANCER: OUR TECHNIQUE. Innovative Medicine of Kuban. 2016;(4):23-29. (In Russ.)