Buccal ureteroplasty in a patient with an extended stricture of the proximal ureter of a solitary kidney
https://doi.org/10.35401/2500-0268-2021-23-3-52-56
Abstract
Buccal ureteroplasty is considered a rare operation in urology and the indications for its implementation are still not clearly defined. We have described a clinical case of successful replacement of a part of the proximal ureter with a buccal graft in a patient with a single kidney, which was drained for a long time with a nitinol stent, which was subsequently incrustated, which led to the installation of a permanent nephrostomy drainage. The patient had no postoperative complications, the patency of the urinary tract was fully restored.
About the Authors
A. A. VolkovRussian Federation
Andrey A. Volkov, Cand. of Sci. (Med.), Head of the Surgical Center of the State Budgetary Institution Hospital for War Veterans of the Rostov Region
26 line, 27, Rostov-on-Don, 344025
N. V. Budnik
Russian Federation
Nikolay V. Budnik, Cand. of Sci. (Med.), Head of the Surgical Center of the State Budgetary Institution Hospital for War Veterans of the Rostov Region
Rostov-on-Don
I. D. Mustapaev
Russian Federation
Irbaikhan D. Mustapaev, Urologist of the Surgical Center of the Sur-gical Center of the State Budgetary Institution Hospital for War Veterans of the Rostov Region
Rostov-on-Don
References
1. Arvind PG, Abhishek GS, Mohammed RI, Parag S, et al. Robotic buccal mucosa graft ureteroplasty (inlay and onlay) for upper ureteric stricture: point of technique. J Minim Access Surg. 2018;14(4):357–361. PMID: 29483376. PMCID: PMC6130176. https://doi.org/10.4103/jmas.JMAS18817
2. Xiong S, Zhu W, Li X, Zhang P, Wang H, Li X. Intestinal interposition for complex ureteral reconstruction: a comprehensive review. Int J Urol. 2020;27(5):377–386. PMID: 32189401. https://doi.org/10.1111/iju.14222
3. Knight RB, Hudak SJ, Morey AF. Strategies for open reconstruction of upper ureteral strictures. Urol. Clin. North Am. 2013;40(3):351–61. PMID: 23905933. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ucl.2013.04.005
4. Nishimura Y, Moriya K, Nakamura M, Kitta T, et al. Laparoscopic ureterocalicostomy for ureteropelvic junction obstruction in a 10-year-old female patient: a case report. BMC Reserch Notes. 2017;10(1):247. PMID: 28683770. PMCID: PMC5500951. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-017-2569-x.
5. Volkov AA, Budnik NV, Zuban ON, et al. Buccal ureteroplasty for recurrent extended strictures and obliterations of distal ureter. Bulletin of RSMU. 2020;6:113–20. https://doi.org/10.24075/brsmu.2020.079
6. Hofer MD, Aguilar-Cruz HJ, Singla N, et al. Expanding applications of renal mobilization and down ward nephropexy in ureteral reconstruction. Urology. 2016;94:232–236. PMID: 27112510. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2016.04.008
7. Burgos FJ, Linares A, Gomez V, et al. Efficacy of selfexpanding metallic stents for treatment of ureteral obstruction. Eur Urol Suppl. 2001;39(5):86.
8. Kallidonis PS, Georgiopoulos IS, Kyriazis ID, et al. Drugeluting metallic stents in urology. Indian J Urol. 2014;30(1):8–12. PMID: 24497674. PMCID: PMC3897059. https://doi.org/10.4103/0970-1591.124198
9. Kallidonis P, Kotsiris D, Sanguedolce F, et al. Young academic urologists of the European Association of Urology – endourology, urolithiasis working party. The effectiveness of ureteric metalstentsin malignant ureteric obstructions: a systematic review. Arab J Urol. 2017;15(4):280–288. PMID: 29234529. PMCID: PMC5717459. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aju.2017.08.004
10. Guliev BG, Zagazezhev AM. Long-term results of stenting for extended ureteral strictures using nitinol stents. Experimental and clinical urology. 2015;2:64–67. (In Russ.).
11. Khoo CC, Abboudi H, Cartwright R, El-Husseiny T, Dasgupta R. Metallic ureteric stents in malignant ureteric obstruction: a systematic review. Urology. 2018;118:12–20. PMID: 29408390. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2018.01.019
12. Morcillo E, Fernández I, Pamplona M, SánchezMargallo FM, Soria F. Stents ureterales metálicos. Presente y futuro [Metallic ureteral stents. Present and future]. Arch Esp Urol. 2016;69(8):583–594. PMID: 27725334 ( In Spanish).
13. Volkov AA, Zuban ON, Budnik NV, Saenko GI. Surgical treatment of extended strictures and ureteral obliterations using oral mucosa graft. Our own experience. Experimental and clinical urology. 2020;3:124–131 (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.29188/2222-8543-2020-12-3-124-131
14. KatibovMI,BogdanovAB,DovlatovZA.Buccal urethroplasty: 2020 literature review update. Experimental and clinical urology. 2020;3:118–123. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.29188/2222-8543-2020-12-3-118-123
15. Hefermehl LJ, Tritschler S, Kretschmer A, et al. Open ureteroplasty with buccal mucosa graft for long proximal strictures: A good option for a rare problem. Investig Clin Urol. 2020;61(3):316–322. PMID: 32377609. PMCID: PMC7189109. https://doi.org/10.4111/icu.2020.61.3.316
16. Kumar A, Dangi AD, Mukha RP, et al. Can kidneys be saved in patients with urinary tuberculosis? A study in the era of modern chemotherapy and surgical armamentarium. Int J Urol. 2019;26(5):551–557. PMID: 30803052. https://doi.org/10.1111/iju.13926
Review
For citations:
Volkov A.A., Budnik N.V., Mustapaev I.D. Buccal ureteroplasty in a patient with an extended stricture of the proximal ureter of a solitary kidney. Innovative Medicine of Kuban. 2021;(3):52-56. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.35401/2500-0268-2021-23-3-52-56