Role of CT Angiography in Detection of Extracranial Carotid and Vertebral Artery Disease in Patients With Acutely Ruptured Intracranial Aneurysms

Introduction: Computed tomography (CT) and CT angiography are standard imaging modalities for suspected acute intracerebral hemorrhage due to ruptured intracranial aneurysms. In this clinical setting, several protocols of computed tomography and CT angiography may be implemented. The standard CT angiography protocol is limited to intracranial vessels. The extended protocol may also include carotid and vertebral arteries and the aortic arch.

Objective: To define the CT angiography role in detection of extracranial carotid and vertebral artery disease and clinical significance of this method for patients with suspected acute intracerebral hemorrhages due to ruptured intracranial aneurysms.

Materials and methods: The study included 275 neurosurgical patients with acute nontraumatic intracranial hemorrhages due to ruptured intracranial aneurysms who were treated in Scientific Research Institute – Ochapovsky Regional Clinical Hospital No. 1 (Krasnodar, Russian Federation) from September 2017 to August 2020. Computed tomography and CT angiography were performed in all patients. The scanned area included both intracranial and extracranial arteries (an arch-to-vertex angiogram) to detect extracranial carotid and vertebral artery diseases such as stenoses, occlusions, tortuosity, and hypoplasia.

Results: Atherosclerosis of internal carotid and vertebral arteries was diagnosed in 95 patients (34.5% of the total number of patients included in the study). In 13 (4.7%) patients these stenoses were hemodynamically significant. We identified a high frequency of tortuous carotid and vertebral arteries (122 cases, 44.3%) and vertebral artery hypoplasia (59 cases, 21.5%). The carotid and vertebral artery stenoses and congenital anomalies of vertebral arteries (however, not of carotid arteries) were associated with a higher incidence of unfavorable outcomes after endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms.

Conclusions: The optimal CT angiography protocol for acute nontraumatic intracranial hemorrhage should focus on the arteries of the head and neck (up to the aortic arch). This protocol shows higher detection rate of concomitant anomalies of carotid and vertebral arteries. These findings are important for planning and successful performance of endovascular treatment for intracranial aneurysms. 

1. All-Russian Society of Neurologists, National Stroke Association of Russian Federation, Russian Association of Neurosurgeons, et al. Clinical guidelines. Ischemic Stroke and Transient Ischemic Attack in Adults. Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation. Accessed April 10, 2022. (In Russ.). https://cr.minzdrav.gov.ru/recomend/171_2

2. Skvortsova VI, Krylov VV, eds. Hemorrhagic Stroke: A Practical Guide. GEOTAR-Media; 2005. (In Russ.).

3. Krylov VV, Dashyan VG, Burov AS, Petrikov SS. Surgery for Hemorrhagic Stroke. Meditsina; 2012. (In Russ.).

4. Hemphill JC 3rd, Greenberg SM, Anderson CS, et al. Guide lines for the management of spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage: a guideline for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2015;46(7):2032–2060. PMID: 26022637. https://doi.org/10.1161/STR.0000000000000069

5. Connolly ES Jr, Rabinstein AA, Carhuapoma JR, et al. Guidelines for the management of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: a guideline for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2012;43(6):1711–1737. PMID: 22556195. https://doi.org/10.1161/STR.0b013e3182587839

6. Hacein-Bey L, Provenzale JM. Current imaging assessment and treatment of intracranial aneurysms. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011;196(1):32–44. PMID: 21178044. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.10.5329

7. Konovalov AN, Krylov VV, Filatov YuM, et al. Advisable management protocol for patients with subarachnoidal hemorrhage resulting from cerebral vascular aneurysmal rupture. Burdenko’s Journal of Neurosurgery. 2006:3;3–10. (In Russ.).

8. Kornienko VN, Pronin IN. Diagnostic Neuroradiology. Vol 1. Burdenko Institute; 2008. (In Russ.).

9. Meurer WJ, Walsh B, Vilke GM, Coyne CJ. Clinical guidelines for the emergency department evaluation of subarachnoid hemorrhage. J Emerg Med. 2016;50(4):696–701. PMID: 26823138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jemermed.2015.07.048

10. Rotzinger DC, Mosimann PJ, Meuli RA, et al. Site and rate of occlusive disease in cervicocerebral arteries: a CT angiography study of 2209 patients with acute ischemic stroke. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2017;38(5):868–874. PMID: 28302611. PMCID: PMC7960392. https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.a5123

11. Willinsky RA, Taylor SM, TerBrugge K, et al. Neurologic complications of cerebral angiography: prospective analysis of 2,899 procedures and review of the literature. Radiology. 2003;227(2):522–528. PMID: 12637677. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2272012071

12. Menke J, Larsen J, Kallenberg K. Diagnosing cerebral aneurysms by computed tomographic angiography: meta-analysis. Ann Neurol. 2011;69(4):646–654. PMID: 21391230. https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.22270

13. Westerlaan HE, van Dijk JMC, Jansen-van der Weide MC, et al. Intracranial aneurysms in patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage: CT angiography as a primary examination tool for diagnosis—systematic review and meta-analysis. Radiology. 2011;258(1):134–145. PMID: 20935079. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.10092373

14. Marder CP, Narla V, Fink JR, Tozer Fink KR. Subarachnoid hemorrhage: beyond aneurysms. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2014;202(1):25–37. PMID: 24370126. https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.12.9749

15. Sailer AMH, Grutters JP, Wildberger JE, еt al. Cost-effectiveness of CTA, MRA and DSA in patients with non-traumatic subarachnoid haemorrhage. Insights Imaging. 2013;4(4):499–507. PMID: 23839858. PMCID: PMC3731460. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13244-013-0264-6

16. Shi Z, Hu B, Schoepf UJ, et al. Artificial intelligence in the management of intracranial aneurysms: current status and future perspectives. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2020;41(3):373–379. PMID: 32165361. PMCID: PMC7077887. https://doi.org/10.3174/ ajnr.a6468

17. Chung PW, Won YS. Cerebral arterial stenosis in patients with spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage. J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 2017;60(5):511–517. PMID: 28881113. PMCID: PMC5594619. https://doi.org/10.3340/jkns.2016.1011.003

18. Kirilenko AN, Zyablova EI. Clinical case of arterio-venous malformation of neck as an incidental finding. Innovative Medicine of Kuban. 2019;(1):53–56. (In Russ.)

19. Fox AJ, Symons SP, Aviv RI, et al. Falsely claiming use of NASCET percentage stenosis method. Radiology. 2009;253(2):574–575. PMID: 19864535. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2532090821

20. Fox AJ, Singh N. Clinical trials for carotid stenosis revascularization and relation to methods of stenosis quantification. Neurovascular Imaging. 2015;1(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40809-015-0002-1