In Vivo Simulation of the Purulent Peritonitis
https://doi.org/10.35401/2541-9897-2023-26-1-89-96
Abstract
Currently, purulent-inflammatory diseases of the abdominal organs are the prevalent causes of complications and mortality. Treatment of these diseases complicated by peritonitis is one of the urgent problems in modern clinical medicine. Experiment is important for testing new treatment methods. This article provides a systematic analysis of the current in vivo models of the purulent peritonitis, which are used to test the options for surgical treatment and combinations of antibacterial drugs. We describe the most common models as well as rare simulations of specific peritonitis. It should be noted that despite the wide use of minimally invasive techniques, the literature has few reports on simulation of peritonitis through the laparoscopic approach.
About the Authors
V. A. Lazarenko
Kursk State Medical University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Victor A. Lazarenko, Dr. Sci. (Med.), Professor, Rector
Kursk
V. A. Lipatov
Kursk State Medical University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Viacheslav A. Lipatov, Dr. Sci. (Med), Professor, Professor at the Department of Operative Surgery and Applied Anatomy; Chief of the Experimental Surgery and Oncology Laboratory, Scientific Research Institute of Experimental Medicine
Kursk
D. A. Severinov
Kursk State Medical University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Dmitriy A. Severinov, Cand. Sci. (Med.), Associate Professor, Department of Pediatric Surgery and Pediatrics, Institute of Continuing Education
ulitsa Karla Marksa 3, Kursk, 305041
V. P. Gavriliouk
Kursk State Medical University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Vasili P. Gavriliouk, Dr. Sci. (Med), Associate Professor, Head of the Department of Pediatric Surgery and Pediatrics, Institute of Continuing Education
Kursk
E. A. Bobrovskaya
Kursk State Medical University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Elena A. Bobrovskaya, Dr. Sci. (Med), Associate Professor, Professor of the Surgical Pathology Department, Institute of Continuing Education
Kursk
References
1. Arutyunyan AS, Blagovestnov DA, Levitsky VD, Yartsev PA. Diffuse appendicular peritonitis: laparoscopic vs open access — viewpoint from aside. Russian Sklifosovsky Journal “Emergency Medical Care”. 2022;11(1):137–146. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.23934/2223-9022-2022-11-1-137-146
2. Gelfand BR, Kirienko AI, Khachatryan NN, eds. Postoperative Abdominal Infection: Russian National Recommendations. 2nd ed, revised and amended. OOO “Meditsinskoe informatsionnoe agentstvo”; 2018. (In Russ.).
3. Kemerov SV, Dorzhieva TS, Stepin DA, Kemerova ZS. Studying the microbial landscape of peritoneal exudate in acute diffuse purulent peritonitis. Kazan medical journal. 2016;97(5):806–811. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17750/kmj2016-806
4. Strionova VS, Nalyotov AV, Shcherbinin AV, Rogovoy AN. Features of the appendicular peritonitis in children. University Hospital. 2021;(3):93–97. (In Russ.).
5. Vlasov AP, Zelentsov PV, Vlasova TI, Shibitov VA, Suvorovа LA, Timoshkin SP. The advance factors of endogenic intoxication at acute peritonitis. Fundamental Research. 2013;(3–2):260–264. (In Russ.).
6. Chepurnykh EE, Shurygina IA, Fadeeva TV, Grigorev EG. Modeling of diffuse purulent peritonitis. Modern Problems of Science and Education. 2020;(6). (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17513/spno.30264
7. Fink MP. Animal models of sepsis. Virulence. 2014;5(1): 143–153. PMID: 24022070. PMCID: PMC3916368. https://doi.org/10.4161/viru.26083
8. Murando F, Peloso A, Cobianchi L. Experimental abdominal sepsis: sticking to an awkward but still useful translational model. Mediators Inflamm. 2019;2019:8971036. PMID: 31885502. PM-CID: PMC6915118. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/8971036
9. van der Poll T. Preclinical sepsis models. Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2012;13(5):287–292. https://doi.org/10.1089/sur.2012.105
10. Ahrenholz DH, Simmons RL. Fibrin in peritonitis. I. Beneficial and adverse effects of fibrin in experimental E. coli peritonitis. Surgery. 1980;88(1):41–47. PMID: 6992321.
11. Stamme C, Bundschuh DS, Hartung T, et al. Temporal sequence of pulmonary and systemic inflammatory responses to graded polymicrobial peritonitis in mice. Infect Immun. 1999;67(11):5642–5650. PMID: 10531211. PMCID: PMC96937. https://doi.org/10.1128/iai.67.11.5642-5650.1999
12. Glukhov AA, Baranov AV, Alekseeva NT, Ostroushko AP. Treatment of the acute experimental peritonitis with application of ultrasonic postoperative sanation of the abdominal cavity. System Analysis and Management in Biomedical Systems. 2009;8(1):180– 184. (In Russ.).
13. Lazarenko VA, Lipatov VA, Blinkov YuYu, Skorikov DV. Experimental model of diffuse fecal peritonitis. Kursk Scientific and Practical Bulletin “Man and His Health”. 2008;(4):128–132. (In Russ.).
14. Gonnert FA, Recknagel P, Seidel M, et al. Characteristics of clinical sepsis reflected in a reliable and reproducible rodent sepsis model. J Surg Res. 2011;170(1):e123–134. PMID: 21737102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2011.05.019
15. Lee MJ, Kim K, Jo YH, Lee JH, Hwang JE. Dose-dependent mortality and organ injury in a cecal slurry peritonitis model. J Surg Res. 2016:206(2):427–434. PMID: 27884339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2016.08.054
16. Ren Y, Hua L, Meng X, et al. Correlation of surface toll-like receptor 9 expression with IL-17 Production in neutrophils during septic peritonitis in mice induced by E. coli. Mediators Inflamm. 2016;2016:3296307. PMID: 27057095. PMCID: PMC4785266. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/3296307
17. Rejs BA, Rejs AB, inventors; Gosudarstvennoe obrazo vatel’noe uchrezhdenie Vysshego professional’nogo obrazovanija “Omskaja gosudarstvennaja meditsinskaja akademija Federal’nogo agentstva po zdravookhraneniju i sotsial’nomu razvitiju Roszdrava”, assignee. Method of simulating acute general peritonitis in rats. Russian patent RU2427925C1. August 27, 2011.
18. Kosinets VА, Samsonova IV, Ryzhkovskaya EL. Structural changes in the small intestine at experimental widespread purulent peritonitis. Novosti Khirurgii. 2011;19(5):9–16 (In Russ.).
19. Volkov AG, Volkova LV, Zarivchatsky MF, Kosareva PV. The model development of acute peritonitis for examination of new medications under the curing of abdominal infection. Russian Journal of Biopharmaceuticals. 2018;10(1):45–48. (In Russ.).
20. Alipov VV, Avanesyan GA, Musayelyan AG, Alipov AI. Modeling of localized limited peritonitis. Morphology. 2019;155(2):15. (In Russ.).
21. Shalimov SA, Radzikhovskii AP, Keisevich LV. Manual of Experimental Surgery. Meditsina; 1989. (In Russ.).
22. Ismagilov FA, inventor; Ismagilov FA, assignee. Method of modeling acute peritonitis. Russian Patent RU2383058C1. February 27, 2010.
23. Polyanskii IYu, Milkov BO, Khlopov NA. Modeling of acute purulent peritonitis. Mezhvuzovskii sbornik nauchnykh trudov. 1981;(7):11. (In Russ.).
24. Khripun AI, Sazhin IV, Churkin AA, Alimov AN, Asratyan SA. Results of the accelerated recovery protocol for perforated duodenal ulcer. Moscow Surgical Journal. 2021;(1):47–53. (In Russ.).
25. Terent’ev AA, Porjadin GV, Smirnov VM, Kazimirskij AN, Salmasi ZhM, Lychkova AE, inventors; Terent’ev AA, Porjadin GV, Smirnov VM, Kazimirskij AN, Salmasi ZhM, Lychkova AE, assignees. Method of peritonitis simulation. Russian patent RU2367029C1. September 10, 2009.
26. Chernyadyev SA, Kubasov KA, Bulaeva EI. Creating peritonitis in experimental conditions. Ural Medical Journal. 2016;(8):123–124. (In Russ.).
27. Clowes GH Jr, Zuschneid W, Turner M, et al. Observations on the pathogenesis of the pneumonitis associated with severe infections in other parts of the body. Ann Surg. 1968;167(5):630– 650. PMID: 4869050. PMCID: PMC1387110. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000658-196805000-00003
28. Ryan NT, Blackburn GL, Clowes HA Jr. Differential tissue sensitivity to elevated endogenous insulin levels during experimental peritonitis in rats. Metabolism. 1974;23(11):1081–1089. https://doi.org/10.1016/0026-0495(74)90075-4
29. Wichterman KA, Baue AE, Chaudry IH. Sepsis and septic shock – a review of laboratory models and a proposal. Journal of Surgical Research. 1980;29(2):189–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/00224804(80)90037-2
30. Liu X, Wang N, Wei G, et al. Consistency and pathophysiological characterization of a rat polymicrobial sepsis model via the improved cecal ligation and puncture surgery. Int Immunopharmacol. 2016;32:66–75. PMID: 26802602. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intimp.2015.12.041
31. Novosel’tsev AV, Chumakov PA, Semenjuk AA, Kirsanov VM, inventors; Gosudarstvennoe obrazovatel’noe uchrezhdenie Vysshego professional’nogo obrazovanija “Omskaja gosudarstvennaja meditsinskaja akademija Federal’nogo agentstva po zdravookhraneniju i sotsial’nomu razvitiju” (GOU VPO OmGMA Roszdrava), assignee. Method for modeling of peritonitis in rats. Russian patent RU2376648C1. December 20, 2009.
32. Weiner JS, Nikonov SD, Atamanov KV, Atamanov DK, Fedorova EV. Development of a technique for treating widespread purulent peritonitis (an experimental study). Lasernaya Medicina. 2019;23(1):46–52. (In Russ.).
33. Traeger T, Koerner P, Kessler W, et al. Colon ascendens stent peritonitis (CASP) – a standardized model for polymicrobial abdominal sepsis. J Vis Exp. 2010;(46):2299. PMID: 21206468. PMCID: PMC3159662. https://doi.org/10.3791/2299
34. Barrera G, Landoni V, Martire-Greco D, et al. Model of polymicrobial peritonitis that induces the proinflammatory and immunosuppressive phases of sepsis. Infect Immun. 2011;79(3):1280–1288. PMID: 21173307. PMCID: PMC3067524. https://doi.org/10.1128/iai.01127-10
35. Morozov AM, Mokhov EM, Kadykov VA, et al. Modern device for peritonitis reproduction in rats. The Bulletin of Contemporary Clinical Medicine. 2019;12(1):99–102. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.20969/vskm.2019.12(1).99-102
36. Plotkin DV, Vinogradova TI, Reshetnikov MN, Zyuzya YuR, Serdobintsev MS, Sinitsyn MN. The optimal modeling method of specific tuberculosis peritonitis (experimental research). Tuberculosis and Lung Diseases. 2022;99(12):44–50. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.21292/2075-1230-2021-99-12-44-50
37. Vinnik YuS, Dunaevskaya SS, Arapova VA, Yakimov SV. Study of activity of chemiluminescent reaction of neutrophils of blood in rats in the model of peritonitis. Far East Medical Journal. 2018;(2):80–83. (In Russ.).
38. Chepurnykh EE, Shurygina IA, Fadeeva TV, Grigoryev EG. Experimental modeling of general purulent peritonitis. Acta Biomedica Scientifica (East Siberian Biomedical Journal). 2019;4(3):117–121. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.29413/abs.2019-4.3.15
39. Cuenca AG, Delano MJ, Kelly-Scumpia KM, Moldawer LL, Efron PA. Cecal ligation and puncture. Curr Protoc Immunol. 2010;91(1). PMID: 21053304. PMCID: PMC3058382. https://doi.org/10.1002/0471142735.im1913s91
40. Dejager L, Pinheiro I, Dejonckheere E, Libert C. Cecal ligation and puncture: the gold standard model for polymicrobial sepsis? Trends Microbiol. 2011;19(4):198–208. PMID: 21296575. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tim.2011.01.001
Review
For citations:
Lazarenko V.A., Lipatov V.A., Severinov D.A., Gavriliouk V.P., Bobrovskaya E.A. In Vivo Simulation of the Purulent Peritonitis. Innovative Medicine of Kuban. 2023;(1):89-96. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.35401/2541-9897-2023-26-1-89-96
Views:
392
Email this article 
