Preview

Innovative Medicine of Kuban

Advanced search

SURGERY FOR DEGENERATIVE STENOSIS OF LUMBAR SPINE WITH DYNAMIC IMPLANT APPLICATION

Abstract

Objective. Main purpose of the present paper is improvement surgical results following lumbar spine stenosis treatment.

Materials and Methods. We have analysed outcomes of 124 operated on patients: 56 patients were operated on with wide decompression application and spondylosis formation (Group 1), 68 (Group 2) had mini-invasive decompression (facetectomy, flavectomy, arch marginal resection) and placement of dynamic interspinal DIAM implants. We excluded patients with spondylolytic spondylolisthesis.

Results. We have found no actual difference for the following up period (from 22 months to 10.5 years) between both techniques for leg pain control. In 16.7% patients (had operation on 2 and more segments) we noticed postoperative pains lower and superior fixation area, in patients with DIAM implants after mini-invasive decompression there was no pain syndrome. In one case we found fixation system break down and it required repeated placement. Patients of both group with one-segment operation demonstrated no significant difference in spinal pain syndromes. And the patients of Group 2 had lower intraoperative blood loss and overall operative time.

Conclusion. Mini-invasive decompression with dynamic implants placement is a safe and reliable alternative for spinal cord stenosis treatment comparing to wide decompression and spondylesis formation.

About the Authors

M. M. Aleksanyan
Petrovsky Russian Scientific Center of Surgery
Russian Federation


A. G. Aganesov
Petrovsky Russian Scientific Center of Surgery
Russian Federation


References

1. Amoldi CC. Lumbar Spinal Stenosis and Nerve Root Entrapment Syndromes./ Amoldi, С. C.; Brodsky, A. E.; Cauchoix, J. at al. // Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research-March/April 1976 - Volume 115-P. 4-5.

2. Deyo R. Trends, Major Medical Complications, and Charges Associated With Surgery for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis in Older Adults/ Deyo R., Sohail M., Brook M., at al. // Journal of the American Medical Association-2010-Vol.303(13)-P.1259 - 1265.

3. Deyo R. United States Trends in Lumbar Fusion Surgery for Degenerative Conditions/ Deyo R., Gray D., Kreuter W., Mirza S., Martin В. // Spine- 15 June 2005 -Volume 30 - Issue 12 - P. 1441 - 1445.

4. Mclvor G. Pathological and Myelographie Changes in the Major Types of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis. / Mclvor, G., Kirkaldy-Willis, W. // Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research- March/April 1976 - Volume 115 -P. 72 - 76.

5. Niggemeyer O. Comparison of surgical procedures for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: A meta-analysis of the literature from 1975 to 1995/0. Niggemeyer, J.M. Strauss, К.P. Schulitz // European Spine Joumal-December 1997- Vol. 6- Iss 6- P. 423 - 429.

6. Sachs B. Progressive ankylotic rigidity of the spine (spondylosw rhizomelique)/ B.Sachs, J. Fraenkel// Journal of Nervous & Mental Disease. - 1900 - Vol.27 - Iss l - P. 1-15.

7. Sumita M. Zur Frage der Eisenreaktion kalkhaltiger Gewebe, insbesondere des Knochens // Springer - 1910 Mai - Vol. 200 - Iss 2 - P. 220 - 258

8. Tile M. Spinal Stenosis: Results of Treatment / Tile M., McNeil S. Zarins R. at all / Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research- March/April 1976 - Volume 115 - P. 104-108.

9. Verbiest H. A radicular syndrome from developmental narrowing of the lumbar vertebral canal. // J Bone Joint Surg Br - May 1954 - vol. 36-B - no. 2 - P. 230-237.

10. Weinstein J. United States Trends and Regional Variations in Lumbar Spine Surgery: 1992-2003/ Weinstein J., Lurie J., Olson P, Brenner К., Morgan T. // Spine (Phila Pa 1976) - 2006 Nov-Voll -Iss 31(23) - P. 2707-2714.

11. Wiltse L. The Treatment of Spinal Stenosis/Wiltse L.; Kirkaldy-Willis W., Mclvor G. // Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research- March/April 1976 - Volume 115 - P. 83-91.


Review

For citations:


Aleksanyan M.M., Aganesov A.G. SURGERY FOR DEGENERATIVE STENOSIS OF LUMBAR SPINE WITH DYNAMIC IMPLANT APPLICATION. Innovative Medicine of Kuban. 2017;7(3):34-37. (In Russ.)

Views: 468


ISSN 2541-9897 (Online)