Preview

Innovative Medicine of Kuban

Advanced search

Changes in Geometry and Hemodynamics After Carotid Endarterectomy

https://doi.org/10.35401/2541-9897-2024-9-4-60-67

Abstract

Background: Many studies on cerebral atherosclerosis and its treatment have been conducted over the past 60 years. Several modifications of open surgical treatment (carotid endarterectomy) have been proposed. There are several techniques of carotid endarterectomy; however, there is no consensus on advantages of any of these techniques.

Objective: To analyze the anatomy and geometry of the common carotid artery bifurcation in patients with hemodynamically significant stenoses of the internal carotid artery.

Materials and methods: To study geometric parameters, we used computed tomography data of patients operated on at the Scientific Research Institute – Ochapovsky Regional Clinical Hospital No. 1 (Krasnodar, Russian Federation). The patients underwent the following procedures: classical, eversion, or glomus-sparing carotid endarterectomy. We built geometric models using specialized software and studied hemodynamics at the common carotid artery bifurcation in the early postoperative period (1 day after surgery) and 1 year after surgery.

Results and conclusion: Zones at risk for atherosclerotic plaque formation are mainly in the common carotid artery. This phenomenon is explained by the surgery technique, namely, by the fact that the cut line of the atherosclerotic plaque is located in this region. Models built on the basis of computed tomographic angiograms 1 year after surgery demonstrate a decrease in the area of zones at risk. This might be due to the arterial wall smoothing and neointima formation.

About the Authors

V. P. Derbilova
Kuban State Medical University; Scientific Research Institute – Ochapovsky Regional Clinical Hospital No. 1
Russian Federation

Viktoriya P. Derbilova - Postgraduate Student, Surgery Department No. 1, Faculty of Continuing Professional Development and Retraining, Kuban State Medical University; Cardiovascular Surgeon, Vascular Surgery Unit No. 2, Scientific Research Institute – Ochapovsky Regional Clinical Hospital No. 1.

Krasnodar



R. A. Vinogradov
Kuban State Medical University; Scientific Research Institute – Ochapovsky Regional Clinical Hospital No. 1
Russian Federation

Roman A. Vinogradov - Dr. Sci. (Med.), Head of the Vascular Surgery Unit No. 1, Scientific Research Institute – Ochapovsky Regional Clinical Hospital No. 1; Professor at the Surgery Department No. 1, Faculty of Continuing Professional Development and Retraining, Kuban State Medical University.

Krasnodar



Yu. N. Zakharov
Federal Research Center for Information and Computational Technologies
Russian Federation

Yury N. Zakharov - Dr. Sci. (Phys.-Math.), Laboratory Head, Federal Research Center for Information and Computational Technologies.

Novosibirsk



V. G. Borisov
Kemerovo State University; Federal Research Center for Information and Computational Technologies
Russian Federation

Vladimir G. Borisov - Cand. Sci. (Phys.-Math.), Associate Professor, Associate Professor at the Department of Fundamental Mathematics, Kemerovo State University; Senior Researcher, Federal Research Center for Information and Computational Technologies.

Kemerovo; Novosibirsk



E. E. Kheteeva
Kuban State Medical University; Scientific Research Institute – Ochapovsky Regional Clinical Hospital No. 1
Russian Federation

Elina E. Kheteeva - Department Assistant, Surgery Department No. 1, Faculty of Continuing Professional Development and Retraining, Kuban State Medical University; Cardiovascular Surgeon, Vascular Surgery Unit No. 1, Scientific Research Institute – Ochapovsky Regional Clinical Hospital No. 1.

Krasnodar



E. R. Vinogradova
Kuban State Medical University
Russian Federation

Elvira R. Vinogradova - 6th Year Student, Faculty of Medicine, Kuban State Medical University.

Krasnodar



O. M. Meshcheryakova
Scientific Research Institute – Ochapovsky Regional Clinical Hospital No. 1
Russian Federation

Olga M. Meshcheryakova - Ultrasonographer, Scientific Research Institute – Ochapovsky Regional Clinical Hospital No. 1.

Krasnodar



V. A. Gagin
Scientific Research Institute – Ochapovsky Regional Clinical Hospital No. 1
Russian Federation

Vladimir A. Gagin - Radiologist, Scientific Research Institute – Ochapovsky Regional Clinical Hospital No. 1.

Krasnodar



E. I. Zyablova
Kuban State Medical University; Scientific Research Institute – Ochapovsky Regional Clinical Hospital No. 1
Russian Federation

Elena I. Zyablova - Dr. Sci. (Med.), Associate Professor, Head of the Diagnostic Radiology Department No. 2, Kuban State Medical University; Head of the Radiology Unit, Scientific Research Institute – Ochapovsky Regional Clinical Hospital No. 1.

Krasnodar



A. G. Baryshev
Kuban State Medical University; Scientific Research Institute – Ochapovsky Regional Clinical Hospital No. 1
Russian Federation

Aleksandr G. Baryshev - Dr. Sci. (Med.), Associate Professor, Head of the Surgery Department No. 1, Faculty of Continuing Professional Development and Retraining, Kuban State Medical University; Deputy Chief Physician for Surgical Care, Scientific Research Institute – Ochapovsky Regional Clinical Hospital No. 1.

Krasnodar



References

1. Clagett GP. Intimal hyperplasia and restenosis after carotid endarterectomy. Journal of Vascular Surgery. 1989;10(5):577–579. https://doi.org/10.1016/0741-5214(89)90150-x

2. DeGroote RD, Lynch TG, Jamil Z, Hobson RW 2nd. Carotid restenosis: long-term noninvasive follow-up after carotid endarterectomy. Stroke. 1987;18(6):1031–1036. PMID: 3318001. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.str.18.6.1031

3. Derbilova VP, Vinogradov RA, Zakharov YuN, et al. Computer-assisted modeling of hemodynamic parameters in normal bifurcation of common carotid artery. Angiology and Vascular Surgery. 2022;28(1):29–35. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.33029/1027-6661-2022-28-1-29-35

4. Lee SW, Antiga L, Steinman DA. Correlations among indicators of disturbed flow at the normal carotid bifurcation. J Biomech Eng. 2009;131(6):061013. PMID: 19449967. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3127252

5. Harrison GJ, How TV, Poole RJ, et al. Closure technique after carotid endarterectomy influences local hemodynamics. J Vasc Surg. 2014;60(2):418–427. PMID: 24657293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2014.01.069

6. Kazantsev AN, Tarasov RS, Burkov NN, et al. In-hospital out-comes of transcutaneous coronary intervention and carotid endarterectomy in hybrid and staged regimens. Angiol Sosud Khir. 2019;25(1):101–107. (In Russ.). PMID: 30994615. https://doi.org/10.33529/angio2019114

7. Kazantsev AN, Tarasov RS, Burkov NN, Shabaev AR, Lider RI, Mironov AV. Carotid endarterectomy: three-year results of follow up within the framework of a single-centre register. Angiol Sosud Khir. 2018;24(3):101–107. (In Russ.). PMID: 30321153.

8. Kazantsev AN, Burkov NN, Borisov VG, et al. Computer-assisted simulation of haemodynamic parameters of carotid artery bifurcation after carotid endarterectomy. Angiol Sosud Khir. 2019;25(3):107–112. (In Russ.). PMID: 31503254. https://doi.org/10.33529/ANGIO2019311

9. Miniño AM, Murphy SL, Xu J, Kochanek KD. Deaths: final data for 2008. Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2011;59(10):1–126. PMID: 22808755.

10. Piradov MA, Maksimova MYu, Tanashyan MM. Stroke : Step-by-step Instructions. 2nd rev ed. GEOTAR-Media; 2020:9–12. (In Russ.).

11. Libby P, Ridker PM, Maseri A. Inflammation and atherosclerosis. Circulation. 2002;105(9):1135–1143. PMID: 11877368. https://doi.org/10.1161/hc0902.104353


Review

For citations:


Derbilova V.P., Vinogradov R.A., Zakharov Yu.N., Borisov V.G., Kheteeva E.E., Vinogradova E.R., Meshcheryakova O.M., Gagin V.A., Zyablova E.I., Baryshev A.G. Changes in Geometry and Hemodynamics After Carotid Endarterectomy. Innovative Medicine of Kuban. 2024;(4):60-67. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.35401/2541-9897-2024-9-4-60-67

Views: 293


ISSN 2541-9897 (Online)