Publication date: 25.12.2017
ORIGINAL ARTICLES
Despite the relative decline in the incidence of cancer in Russia, stomach cancer continues to occupy the sixth place in the structure of cancer mortality. The surgical method is the main one in treatment, most often a gastrectomy with enlarged lymphodissection (D2) is performed. There remains the question of which method of digestive system reconstruction after gastrectomy that will provide a good quality of life and social rehabilitation of patients. Loop esophagoenteroanastomosis with intestinal system is the most simple option to restore the digestive system in which the passage of food off the duodenum, which in some patients leads to disruption of metabolic processes and development postgastrectomy functional disorders. To reduce the frequency of these problems using the recovery after gastrectomy physiological passage of food through the duodenum.
Objective. To study the characteristics of protein and carbohydrate metabolism in patients after gastrectomy and petilium option esophagoenteroanastomosis and reservoir enogastronomici with redoutensale.
Material and Methods. Using samples with a double load Staube–Traugott, hyperglycemic coefficient Bowden, determining the level of total blood protein and albumin-globulin ratio, were studied peculiarities of metabolic processes after gastrectomy in 25 patients, digestive system that was restored loop method esophageal-intestinal anastomosis and in 23 patients – enogastronomici.
Results. It was established an advantage in the recovery of protein and carbohydrate metabolism in the group of patients with a reservoir enogastronomico after 3 months after surgery. Tank possible small bowel transplant, replacement remote stomach and the reconstruction of the duodenal passage is allowed to eat more food in single dose (530 ± 80 ml) than after loop reconstruction method (380 ± 50 ml).
Conclusion. The best characteristics of protein and carbohydrate metabolism, as well as a good reservoir function of the proposed method gastric replacement with small intestine can achieve the optimum recovery of metabolic processes and to improve the quality of life of patients after gastrectomy.
Background. We have performed outcome analysis in patients treated for severe compound fractures of lower extremity longitudinal bones regarding a chosen treatment technique for initial surgical debridement and transfer terms in the regional general hospital.
Material and Methods. We reviewed 151 patient reports treated in Scientific Research Institute – Ochapovsky Regional Clinical Hospital no. 1, Krasnodar, for 2012–2016. We defined four methods for initial surgical debridement at the first stage of surgery. Outcomes were analysed in patients regarding their initial surgical debridement and transfer terms into the regional general hospital from the primary admission sites.
Conclusion. It is required to work out regional system for staged treatment in patients with severe compound fractures. At first stage initial surgical treatment is performed by techniques no. 2, 3 and then patients are transferred to the regional general hospital during the first day after being injured. In unstable patients initial surgical debridement should be divided in two stages.