Preview

Innovative Medicine of Kuban

Advanced search

Doppler assessment of throphoblastic blood flow to predict adverse pregnancy outcome

https://doi.org/10.35401/2500-0268-2020-18-2-46-50

Abstract

Objective. To evaluate the diagnostic utility of trophoblastic blood flow Doppler parameters in predicting an adverse pregnancy outcome.

Material and Methods. This was a retrospective study of 218 pregnancies of women between 8 and 11 weeks’ gestation. Depending on the pregnancy outcome, patients were divided into 4 clinical groups. All women underwent an ultrasound examination using Voluson S8, Voluson E8 with high-quality grey scale, color flow mapping and pulsed-wave Doppler modes. We used a program for obstetric research with the following instrument settings: 100 MHz Doppler frequency, thermal index (TI) was <1, mechanical index (MI) was 1. The examination time did not exceed 20 minutes. There was no radiation exposure. Transvaginal and transabdominal sonographies were performed.

Results. To form a risk group for an adverse fetal outcome due to fetoplacental insufficiency, it is necessary to identify ultrasound markers of inadequate placental perfusion by means of a Doppler study of fetoplacental blood flow. For this purpose, we examined 218 pregnancies of women between 8 and 11 weeks’ gestation to determine the diagnostic utility of various parameters: resistivity index, pulsatility index, systolic/diastolic ratio and chorionic vascularization index (k, %). We received results proving high sensitivity (76.9%) and specificity (89.7%) of the chorionic vascularization index (k, %), as well as low specificity (54.7%) and high sensitivity (81.5%) of trophoblastic blood flow resistivity index.

Conclusion. Thus, the chorionic vascularization index (k, %) is of high diagnostic utility for predicting an adverse fetal outcome. 

About the Authors

A. V. Pomortsev
Kuban State Medical University; Regional Clinical Hospital no. 2
Russian Federation

Alexey V. Pomortsev, Dr. of Sci. (Med.), Professor, Head of the Diagnostic Radiology Department; Head of the Center for Radiation Diagnostics 

4, Sedina str., Krasnodar, 350063



J. Yu. Dyachenko
Kuban State Medical University
Russian Federation

Julia Yu. Dyachenko, Assistant Professor, Diagnostic Radiology Department



M. A. Matosyan
Kuban State Medical University
Russian Federation

Mariam A. Matosyan, Assistant Professor, Diagnostic Radiology Department



References

1. Syngelaki A, Guerra L, Ceccacci I, Efeturk T, Nicolaides KH. Impact of holoprosencephaly, exomphalos, megacystis and increased nuchal translucency on first-trimester screening for chromosomal abnormalities. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2017;50:45–8. PMID: 27558969. doi:10.1002/uog.17286

2. Aupont JE, Akolekar R, Illian A, Neonakis S, Nicolaides KH. Prediction of stillbirth from placental growth factor at 19–24 weeks. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2016;48:631–5. PMID: 27854395. doi:10.1002/uog.17229

3. Radzinsky VE, Fuks AM, eds. Obstetrics: Study Guide. Moscow: GEOTAR-Media; 2016. 1040 p. (In Russ.)

4. Akolekar R, Machuca M, Mendes M, Paschos V, Nicolaides KH. Prediction of stillbirth from placental growth factor at 11–13 weeks. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2016;48:618–23. PMID: 27854388. doi:10.1002/uog.17288

5. Radzinsky VE. Obstetric Violence. Moscow: Status Praesens; 2012. 687 p. (In Russ.)

6. Radzinsky VE, Milovanov AP, eds. Extraembryonic and Amniotic Structures in Normal and Complicated Pregnancy. Moscow: Med. inform. agentstvo; 2004. 393 p. (In Russ.)

7. Milovanov AP. Pathology of the ‘Mother – Placenta – Fetus’ system. Moscow: Meditsina; 1999. 448 p. (In Russ.)

8. Milovanov AP, Savelyev SV, eds. Intrauterine Human Development. Moscow: MDV; 2006. 382 p. (In Russ.)

9. Medvedev MV. Prenatal Echography. Differential Diagnosis and Prognosis. 3rd ed. Moscow: Real Taim; 2012. 464 p. (In Russ.)


Review

For citations:


Pomortsev A.V., Dyachenko J.Yu., Matosyan M.A. Doppler assessment of throphoblastic blood flow to predict adverse pregnancy outcome. Innovative Medicine of Kuban. 2020;(2):46-50. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.35401/2500-0268-2020-18-2-46-50

Views: 626


ISSN 2541-9897 (Online)