EXPERIENCE OF ANKLE JOINT REPLACEMENT
Abstract
Background. Study immediate and long-term results following ankle joint endoprosthesis.
Materials and Methods. During the period from 2013 to 2016, we performed 26 ankle joint endoprostheses in patients aged from 19 up to 78 years with arthroses of various etiology. The average operative time was 1,6 hours. Average blood loss was 200 ml. There were 3 cases with an intraoperative fracture of an internal anklebone and they required additional synthesis by one or two screws. In the postoperative period one patient developed some regional necrosis in the postoperative wound area. Developed complications had no impact on observed positive results.
Results. In 24 cases of 26 (92.3%) patients were satisfied with surgery results. In 18 of those (69.2%) the volume of postoperative movements significantly increased, but remained less normal. In 3 cases (11.5%) the volume of movements remained at the preoperative limited level, however the pain syndrome while walking was completely stopped. In 3 patients (11.5%) who had no restrictions in movement amplitude neither prior to nor after the operation, the pain syndrome was also stopped. In 92.3% cases the positive results of ankle joint replacement were received. In 2 cases (7.7%) the received results were estimated as unsatisfactory because of deformation and the remaining pain syndrome. We continue observing patients.
Conclusion. Ankle joint replacement with modern implants allows to achieve the positive immediate and long-term results in 92.3% cases and it is a hi-tech alternative to arthrodesis procedures.
About the Authors
D. L. MiroshnikovRussian Federation
O. V. Sabodashevsky
Russian Federation
A. A. Afaunov
Russian Federation
I. I. Zamyatin
Russian Federation
H. H. Matar
Russian Federation
Yu. V. Napakh
Russian Federation
References
1. Вильямс Д.Ф. Имплантаты в хирургии /Д.Ф. Вильямс, Р. Роуф. - М.: Медицина, 1978. - 552 с.
2. Засульский Ф.Ю. Анализ и прогноз длительности функционирования эндопротеза коленного сустава «Феникс» / Ф.Ю. Засульский, К.А. Новосёлов, A.В. Каземирский и др. // Травматология и ортопедия России. - 2003. - № 1. - С. 92 - 93.
3. Ежов М.Ю. Стопа. Дегенеративнодистрофические заболевания стопы и голеностопного сустава. Н.Новгород. - 2011, 336 с.
4. Пахомов И.А. Обзор проблемы осложнений при эндопротезировании голеностопного сустава. Опыт последних десятилетий. ФГБУ «Новосибирский научно-исследовательский институт травматологии и ортопедии Минздравсоцразвития РФ» (г. Новосибирск) № 4 - 2011 г. 14.00.00 медицинские науки УДК 616.728.48: 616-089-072.1-06.
5. Тихилов Р.М. Опыт эндопротезирования голеностопного сустава в Российском научноисследовательском Институте травматологии и ортопедии им. Р.Р.Вредена /Р.М. Тихилов, Н.А. Корышков, B.Г. Емельянов. // Вестник травматологии и ортопедии им. Н.Н. Приорова - 2009. - № 3. - С.56.
6. Троценко В.В. Динамика защитно-адаптационных реакций при эндопротезировании тазобедренного сустава // Эндопротезирование в травматологии и ортопедии. - М., 1993. - С. 24 - 31.
7. Buechel F.F. Ten year evalution of cementless Buechel-Pappas meniscal bearing total ankle replacement / F.F. Buechel, M.J. Pappas // Foot Ankle Int. - 2003-Vol. 24 - Num 6 - P. 462-472.
8. Carlsson A. Radiometric analysis of the double-coated STAR total ankle prosthesis a 3-5 year followup of 5 cases with rheumatoid arthritis and 5 cases with osteoarthrosis / A. Carlsson. P. Markusson, M. Sundberg // Acta Orthop. - 2005 - Vol. 76. - P. 573 - 579.
9. Glazebrook M.A. Evidence-based classification of complication in total ankle arthroplasty / M.A. Glazebrook, K. Arsenault, M. Dunbar // Foot Ankle Int. - 2009. - Vol. 30. - Num.10. - P. 945 - 949.
10. Martin R.L., Irrgang J.J., Burdett R.G. Evidence of Validity for the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM). - Foot Ankle Int., 2005, v. 26, No 11, P. 968 - 983.
Review
For citations:
Miroshnikov D.L., Sabodashevsky O.V., Afaunov A.A., Zamyatin I.I., Matar H.H., Napakh Yu.V. EXPERIENCE OF ANKLE JOINT REPLACEMENT. Innovative Medicine of Kuban. 2017;6(2):15-20. (In Russ.)